Latest revision as of 14:24, 30 November 2021

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation on the initial shear (cohesion) and torsion-shear strengths at the interface of an interlocking masonry block. An interlocking block is a rigid unit with locks avoiding the block to slide. This improves the seismic response of dry jointed assemblages of masonry structures subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane loading. The experimental investigation is designed and carried out for the corrugated interface having one lock with rectangular cross section, i.e. the specimen is an interlocking unit composed of a main body and a lock located on the upper face of the main body. Cement- based mortars are selected to reproduce the specimen, casted using a mould provided by a 3D printer, and both the lock and the main body are kept rigid during the tests. The initial shear and torsion-shear capacities of the interface at which the lock is connected to the main body are assessed together with its quasi-brittle fracture and registered in terms of load- displacement curves. In the designed setup, the horizontal force is applied to the rigid lock until it is disjointed from the rigid main body of the block, while the effect of rocking during the shear test is avoided. The force and the displacements are measured using a load cell and Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), respectively. The experimental programme includes four different sets with different load application points and different load directions, each set repeated on a number of similar specimens. Empirical formulations between the initial shear and compressive strengths of the lock interface are also evaluated.

Full document

References

[1] Lourenço, P.B., Rots, J.G. and Blaauwendraad, J. Two approaches for the analysis of masonry structures: micro and macro-modeling. Heron (1995) 40(4):1-28.

[2] Li, T. and Atamturktur, S. Fidelity and robustness of detailed micromodeling, simplified micromodeling, and macromodeling techniques for a masonry dome. J. Perform. Constr. Fac. (2013) 28(3):480-490.

[3] Cannizzaro, F., Pantò, B., Caddemi, S. and Caliò, I. A Discrete Macro-Element Method (DMEM) for the nonlinear structural assessment of masonry arches. Eng. Struct. (2018) 168:243-256.

[4] Heyman, J. The stone skeleton: structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge University Press (1995).

[5] Livesley, R.K. A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures. Meccanica (1992) 27(3):161-172.

[6] Casapulla, C., Giresini, L., Argiento, L.U. and Maione, A. Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of rocking masonry corners using rigid macro-block modelling. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dy. (2019) 19(11): art. no. 1950137, 1-32.

[7] Casapulla, C. and Portioli, F. Experimental tests on the limit states of dry-jointed tuff blocks. Mater. Struct. (2016) 49(3):751-767.

[8] Casapulla, C., Argiento, L.U. and Ceraldi, C. Experimental validation of in-plane frictional resistances in dry block masonry walls. In: M. Papadrakakis and M. Fragiadakis (Eds.): Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2017), ECCOMAS Bookseries 1 (2017), pp. 2607-2618.

[9] Liu, H., Liu, P., Lin, K. and Zhao, S. Cyclic behavior of mortarless brick joints with different interlocking shapes. Materials (2016) 9(3): art. no. 166.

[10] Hossain, M.A., Totoev, Y. and Masia, M.J. Friction on mortar-less joints in semi interlocking masonry. In: C. Modena et al. (Eds.): Brick and Block Masonry, CRC Press (2016), pp. 1635-1643.

[11] Dyskin, A.V., Estrin, Y. and Pasternak, E. Topological Interlocking Materials, In: Y. Estrin et al. (Eds.): Architectured Materials in Nature and Engineering, Berlin, Springer (2019), pp. 23-49.

[12] Ali, M., Gultom, R.J. and Chouw, N. Capacity of innovative interlocking blocks under monotonic loading. Constr. Build. Mater. (2012) 37:812-821.

[13] Ceraldi, C., D’Ambra, C., Lippiello, M. and Prota, A. Restoring of timber structures: connections with timber pegs. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. (2017) 75(6):957-971.

[14] Ceraldi, C., Lippiello, M., D’ambra, C. and Prota, A. The influence of dowel-bearing strength in designing timber pegged timber joints. Int. J. of Archit. Herit. (2018) 12(3):362-375.

[15] Fang, D. and Mueller, C.T. Joinery connections in timber frames: analytical and experimental explorations of structural behavior. In: Annual IASS Symposium 2018, IASS (2018), pp. 1-8.

[16] Sassu, M., De Falco, A., Giresini, L. and Puppio, M. Structural solutions for low-cost bamboo frames: Experimental tests and constructive assessments. Materials (2016) 9(5): art. no. 346.

[17] Casapulla, C., Mousavian, E. and Zarghani, M. A digital tool to design structurally feasible semi-circular masonry arches composed of interlocking blocks. Comput. Struct. (2019) 221:111-126.

[18] Mousavian, E. and Casapulla, C. The role of different sliding resistances in limit analysis of hemispherical masonry domes. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale (2020) 51:336-355.

[19] Mousavian, E. and Casapulla, C. Structurally informed design of interlocking block assemblages using limit analysis. J. Comput Des. Eng., in press.

[20] UNI EN 1052-3 (2007). Methods of test for masonry - Part 3: Determination of initial shear strength.

[21] Montazerolghaem, M. and Jäger, W. A Comparative Numerical Evaluation of Masonry Initial Shear Test Methods and Modifications Proposed for EN 1052-3. In: 9th International Masonry Conference (9IMC), Guimarães, Portugal, 2014, pp. 1-10.

[22] Sassu, M., Giresini, L., Bonannini, E. and Puppio, M.L. On the use of vibro-compressed units with bio-natural aggregate. Buildings (2016) 6(3): art. no. 40.

[23] Lippiello, M., Ceraldi, C., D’Ambra, C. and Lignola, G.P. Mechanical characterization of ancient pozzolanic mortars with additions of brick and tuff dust: a comparative investigation. In: K. Van Balen and E. Verstrynge (Eds.): Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Taylor & Francis Group (2016), pp. 558-564.

[24] Lippiello, M. Pozzolanic cementum of the ancient constructions in Campi Flegrei area. Int. J. of Archit. Herit. (2011) 5(1):84-100.

[25] UNI EN 1015-2 (2007). Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry - Part 2: Bulk sampling of mortars and preparation of test mortars.

[26] UNI EN 1015-11 (2007). Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry - Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar.

[27] Ali, N., Ashraf, M., Alam, H. and Ahmed Khan, F. Effect of precompression and mortar ratios on the in-plane shear strength of unreinforced brick masonry. Int. J. Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering (2016) 5(3):78-82.