(Created page with "== Abstract == The present study case highlights the importance of considering local failures for irregular unreinforced masonry buildings, by means of nonlinear seismic ana...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 875150560 to Scupin et al 2021a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 14:22, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The present study case highlights the importance of considering local failures for irregular unreinforced masonry buildings, by means of nonlinear seismic analyses. Simplified seismic assessments based on equivalent frame method were used in order to capture the structural behavior of the National Geological Museum from Bucharest in its initial form and also the current structural layout. The retrofitting works realized in the 1982 were focused on strengthening the transversal masonry walls and on creating horizontal diaphragms to improve the “box behavior” of the building subjected to lateral forces. Retrofitting of unreinforced masonry walls by reinforced concrete jacketing and the replacement of flexible floors by reinforced concrete slabs were previously considered to be effective only though post-earthquake visual inspections of the strengthened elements. The efficiency of past interventions is studied in the present paper through comparisons between the two models in terms of damage patterns, global behavior and also performance levels established function of maximum relative displacements.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] Gospodinov, N. and Lozincă, E. Raport de expertiză tehnică privind starea structurii ansamblului imobiliar Muzeul Național de Geologie Sector 1, București (2011).

[2] Lagomarsino, S., Penna, A., Galasco, A. and Cattari, S. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Eng.Struct. (2013) 56:1787-1799.

[3] Derakhshan, H. and Griffith, M. Final report on Pushover analysis of classes of URM building to characterize drift ratios for different damage levels. (2018).

[4] ASCE Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356 (2000).

[5] Cattari, S., Giongo, I., Marino, S. and Lin, Y. Numerical simulation of the seismic response of an earthquake damaged URM building. In: New Zeeland Society for Earthquake Engineering Technical Conference 2015 (2015).

[6] Fulop, L. and Sippola, M. Constructive and performance analysis of the retrofit systems for vertical masonry elements. Research report (2011).

[7] Hancilar, U., Durukal, E. and Erdik, M. Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historical unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings in Istanbul. In: Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures (2009), pp. 1305-1316.

[8] Churilov, S. and Dumova-Javanoska, E. Analysis of masonry walls strengthened with RC jackets. In: 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2012)

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Vulnerability and risk analysis, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.091
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 6
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?