Latest revision as of 14:20, 30 November 2021

Abstract

Available fire risk assessment approaches are mostly developed for new buildings. These approaches encompass minimum provisions defined by standards that are valid in certain countries, and few of these methods were thought exclusively for assessing the fire safety of cultural heritage. Given the diversity and specificity of cultural heritage assets, simple approaches are thus required to analyse their fire safety and establish their risk mitigation needs. In this context, a simplified fire damage index dedicated to assessing the fire vulnerability of immovable cultural heritage assets is proposed. The proposed index is the result of a weighted multi-parameter evaluation that can be correlated with the level of damage that the cultural heritage asset (including its contents) is expected to suffer under a fire. The proposed index involves twenty-one indicators divided into four categories and offers a flexible approach for universal applicability. The performance of the proposed approach is illustrated for two case studies in Portugal. The results highlight the advantages of having a simple methodology that can be used for the preliminary risk analysis of a large number of assets to identify those requiring risk mitigation measures or detailed and resource-demanding analyses.

Full document

References

[1] Wen, I., Lee M. and Wu, S. Factors Affecting Fire Risk Assessment of Historic Buildings in Taiwan, J. Applied Fire Science, 4 (2013) 22:447-460

[2] NFPA, Code for the Protection of Cultural Resource Properties — Museums, Libraries, and Places of Worship (2013).

[3] Watts, J. and Kaplan, M. Fire Risk Index for Historic Build., F. Tech. (2001)37:167-180.

[4] Chichorro, M., Ferreira, R. and Correia, A. Risk Assessment of Urban Fire – Proposal of a Model for Analysis and Management of Existing Building. (2016).

[5] Lopes, J. P., Coelho, A. L. and Rodrigues J. P. C. Urban Fire Risk Evaluation and the Municipal Emergency Plans. (2012).

[6] Granda, S. and Ferreira , T. M. Assessing Vulnerability and Fire Risk in Old Urban Areas: Application to the Historical Centre of Guimarães. Fire Technology (2019) 55:105-127.

[7] Arborea, A., Mossa, G. and Cucurachi. Preventive fire risk assessment of Italian architectural heritage: An index-based approach. Key Eng. Mat. (2015) 628:27-33.

[8] Romão, X., Paupério, E. and Pereira, N. A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets. Journal of Cultural Heritage. (2016) 20:696–708.

[9] Claret, M. and Andrade, A. Fire Load Survey of Historic Buildings: A Case Study. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering. (2007) 17:103-112.

[10] Li, J., Li, H., Zhou, B., Wang, X. and Zhang, H. Investigation and Statistical Analysis of Fire Loads of 83 Historic Buildings in Beijing. Int. J. of Architectural Her. (2018) 1-12.

[11] Coelho, A.L. Incêndios em edifícios, Orion (2010).

[12] EN1991-1-2. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire. (2002).

[13] Hakkarainen,H and Y. Hayashi, Comparison of Japanese and European Fire Classification Systems for Surface Linings Fire Sci. & Technology , 1 (2001) 21:19-42.

[14] Karlsson, B. Fire Risk Index Method - Multistorey Apart. Build. FRIM-MAB, V.1.2, (2000).

[15] Matsumiya and Oikawa. Quantitative Analysis of Fire Spreading Potential for Surrounding Areas of Cultural Properties in Kyoto City. J. of Asian A. and B. Eng. (2013) 12:269-276.

[16] CFPA-E, Managing fire safety in historical buildings, (2013).

[17] Rager, G. La conservation des objets mobiliers dans les églises La conservation des objets mobiliers dans les églises, Optimisa, (2004).

[18] Kidd, S. Fire Safety Management in Traditional Buildings. Technical applications and management solutions, Technical Conservation Group Historic Scotland, (2010).

[19] NFPA, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, USA: NFPA Association, (2015).