Latest revision as of 14:19, 30 November 2021

Abstract

The protection of the built and archaeological heritage is an increasingly debated topic in recent years. In order to protect these valuable historic structures and preserve them for the future, holistic approaches are necessary. These generally involves a wide range of specialists and collaborators, multidisciplinary way of developing conservation strategies, while maintaining their original features. However, recent studies highlight the fact that the management of heritage sites and buildings is far more than the simple aesthetic and structural repair. It means acknowledging the role of societies and communities in maintaining the importance of these structures and the risk of environmental factors (climate change challenges or earthquake risk) on their state of conservation and the effect of unauthorized interventions over time. Therefore, based on the case study of Orastioara, a commune in Hunedoara County, Romania, where 3 UNESCO heritage sites (from a total of 6 UNESCO sites in the area) can be found and numerous monuments of national and local importance, the study is presenting the challenges encountered during the development of the general urban plan of the commune, in relation with all the establishments that conserve Dacian fortresses – sites UNESCO; and also a proposal for the future management plan of the protected sites. Since the heritage structures have been neglected over the years, the paper comprises a general overview of the complexity of the developed conservation strategy, in order to be able to manage the heritage structures while taking the particularities of their context into consideration.

Full document

References

[1] Musteata, S., Evaluarea și monitorizarea siturilor înscrise în Lista Patrimoniului Mondial din România. Plural. History. Culture. Society (2018) 6(2):65 -66.

[2] Craciun, C. and Mihai, D., Dacian Fortresses of Orăștie Mountains, România – World Heritage, București, (2007).

[3] Quattro Design, PUZ Zona protejata Sarmizegetusa Regia, (2009).

[4] Goran, C. Extras din PUZ Cetățile Dacice, 2010, Secțiune 3.3. Date istorice referitoare la teritoriul studiat, (2010).

[5] Cetatile Dacice din Muntii Orastiei, Programul multianual de Cercetări Arheologice din Munții Orăștiei, finanțat de Ministerul Culturii din România și coordonat de către Muzeul Național de Istorie a Transilvaniei din Cluj – Napoca), https://www.cetati- dacice.ro/ro/situri/sarmizegetusa-regia/istoricul-cercetarilor

[6] Barca, V. Positive and negative aspects in the management of the Dacian fortresses in the Orăștie mountains listed among UNESCO world heritage sites. Journal Of Ancient History And Archaeology (2019) 6(1):108-148.

[7] Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo-Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., Pérez González, E., White, C. and Mazel, A., Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (2018) 20(5- 6):297-318.

[8] Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Roders, A.P. and van Wesemael, P., Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities, (2020) 96:102476.

[9] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2019)

[10] Archäologisches Landesamt Schleswig-Holstein, Project UNESCO – world Heritage Nomination Hedeby and Danevirke, (2013).