(Created page with "== Abstract == Congregation Sherith Israel, one of San Francisco’s lesser known gems, is an historic unreinforced masonry building with a naturally lighted dome...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 345314564 to Paret Rautenberg 2021a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 14:18, 30 November 2021

Abstract

Congregation Sherith Israel, one of San Francisco’s lesser known gems, is an historic unreinforced masonry building with a naturally lighted dome that rises over 100 feet above its centerpiece --- an ornate mural painted vaulted sanctuary that occupies nearly 90 percent of the plan area of the building. Though damaged only modestly by the 1906 earthquake that destroyed many of its unreinforced masonry neighbors, it was subject to a local seismic upgrade ordinance. Various innovative strengthening techniques --- including the first known use in North America of super-elastic nitinol for seismic resistance --- were implemented to supplement the structure’s inherent strengths. The design was developed to permit historically significant features to remain virtually undisturbed; construction was completed in 2017. The building was required by the municipality to be strengthened to meet seismic safety standards for assembly occupancy. Following years of study, a strengthening plan that was feasible and cost-effective, yet would not harm the historic interiors and exterior, was developed and installed. Construction involved an initial phase of more traditional strengthening in 2010 to maintain occupancy on an interim basis, followed by a second phase of innovative technologies to achieve full compliance. The strengthening philosophy relied heavily on supplementing, rather than supplanting the existing building’s strengths and leveraging its natural dynamic characteristics. The nitinol was designed to provide cost-effective easy-to-install structural “fuses” within an octagonally-configured tension tie system to promote re-centering and control out-of-phase, out-of-plane behavior of the vulnerable gable end walls, parapet and arches that define the main facades. Though the nitinol interconnects all four gable end walls, the octagonal configuration of the system causes no disruption to the domed sanctuary by circumventing the interior dome, and the sanctuary today is in the same condition as before the project. The supplemental seismic work included a fiber reinforced polymer catenary and rocking compression-only pilasters to control displacements without incrementing the demand on its floor-to-wall ties.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

References

[1] Petrucci, Enrica, DiLorenzo, Francesco, Tie-Rods and Anchor Plates in Old Buildings: Structural Elements with High Aesthetic Impact. Metalli in Architettura, Scienza E Beni Culturali XXXI. Edizioni Arcadia Ricerche. (2015)

[2] Paret, Terrence F., Freeman, Sigmund A., Searer, Gwenyth, R., Hachem, Mahmoud and Gilmartin, Una M. Using Traditional and Innovative Approaches in the Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of a Historic Masonry Synagogue. Engineering Structures Volume 30, Number 8 Elsevier B.V. (2008)

[3] Paret, Terrence F. Alternative Seismic Strengthening for Sherith Israel in San Francisco, CA. Association for Preservation Technology International Bulletin, (2012), pp. 21-29

[4] Paret, Terrence F., Searer, Gwenyth, R. and Freeman, Sigmund A. The Seismic Strengthening of Temple Sherith Israel, Structure Magazine National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, Volume 26, Number 5, (2019)

[5] Computers and Structures, Inc. “CSI Analysis Reference Manual” SAP2000 version 9.1, Berkeley, CA (2004)

[6] Paret, Terrence F., Freeman, Sigmund A., Searer, Gwenyth, R., Hachem, Mahmoud and Gilmartin, Una M. Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of an Historic Synagogue Using Traditional and Innovative Methods and Materials. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (2006)

[7] Hachem, Mahmoud M., Paret, Terrence F., Searer, G.R., and Freeman, Sigmund A. The Evaluation and Retrofit of a Historic Unreinforced Masonry Building Using Nonlinear Adaptive Pushover and Dynamic Analysis Methods. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing China, (2008)

[8] ADINA R&D Inc. “ADINA: Theory and Modeling Guide”, Report ARD 05-07, Watertown, MA, (2005)

[9] Bonci, A. Carluccicio, G. Castellano, M.G., Croci, G., Infanti S., and Visckovic, A. Use of Shock Transmission Units And Shape Memory Alloy Devices for the Seismic Protection of Monuments: The Case of the Upper Basilica of an Francesco at Assisi, In: International Millennium Congress - More than two thousand years in the history of architecture, UNESO-ICOMOS, Paris, Volume II, (2001)

[10] Castellano, M.G. and Infanti, S. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions - Modena, Lourenco & Roca (eds) Taylor & Francis Group, (2005)

[11] ASTM F2516-2018: Test Method for Tension Testing of Nickel-Titanium Superelastic Materials. ASTM International, (2018).

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Repair and strengthening strategies and techniques, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.063
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 5
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?