(Created page with "== Abstract == Bonded brickwork loadbearing walls are commonly seen in many colonial period structures around the world; however, most research studies in the pa...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 423543543 to Thamboo et al 2021a) |
(No difference)
|
Bonded brickwork loadbearing walls are commonly seen in many colonial period structures around the world; however, most research studies in the past and the current design provisions are primarily based on single leaf brickwork. Due to the anisotropic natu re of brickwork, the strength and deformation characteristics would be different for bonded brickwork walls and their design using the provisions of single leaf bonded brickworks may be un-conservative. Therefore, to understand the compressive behaviour of differently bonded brickworks, an experimental programme followed by a numerical investigation were carried out in this research. The experimental programme comprised of testing nine wallettes under uniaxial compression. Three different types of bonded thicknesses (single, double and triple) were used to construct the wallettes. The experimental results are presented and discussed in terms of failure modes, compressive strengths and stress-strain responses obtained. Further a numerical investigation based on the micro modelling approach was employed to verify the experimental findings. The experimental and numerical modelling results indicate that the change in brickwork thicknesses does not significantly increase the compressive strength of the masonry. The increased number of weak perpend joints in the bonded brickwork wallettes, could be a reason of lower strength and thus, a general notion of increment in compressive resistance due to the reduction in slenderness i s not applicable for bonded brickwork. Parametric analyses were also carried out and reported for different slenderness ratios to extend the understanding on the behaviour of bonded brickworks under compression.
[1] Bennett, R.M., Boyd, K.A., and Flanagan, R.D. Compressive properties of structural clay tile prisms. J. Struct. Eng (1997) 123(7): 920–926.
[2] Thamboo, J.A. and Dhanasekar, M. Behaviour of thin layer mortared concrete masonry under combined shear and compression. Aust. J. Struct. Eng (2016) 17(1): 39–52.
[3] Zahra, T. and Dhanasekar, M. Prediction of masonry compressive behaviour using a damage mechanics inspired modelling method. Constr. Build. Mater (2016) 109: 128–138.
[4] Pelà, L., Canella, E., Aprile, A., and Roca, P. Compression test of masonry core samples extracted from existing brickwork. Constr. Build. Mater (2016) 119: 230–240.
[5] Segura, J., Pela, L. and Roca, P. Monotonic and cyclic testing of clay brick and lime mortar masonry in compression. Constr. Build. Mater (2018) 193: 453–466.
[6] Gumeste, K.S. and Venkatarama Reddy, B.V. Strength and elasticity of brick masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. Mater. Struct (2007) 29: 241–253
[7] Zahra, T. and Dhanasekar, M. A generalised damage model for masonry under compression. Int. J. Damage Mech. (2016) 25(5): 629–660.
[8] Thamboo, J.A. and Dhanasekar, M. Correlation between the performance of solid masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. J. Build. Eng (2019) 22: 429–438.
[9] Valluzzi, M.R., Da Porto, F. and Modena, C. Behavior and modeling of strengthened three-leaf stone masonry walls. Mater. Struct (2004) 37(3): 184–192.
[10] Binda, L., Pina-Henriques, J., Anzani, A., Fontana, A. and Lourenco, P.B. A contribution for the understanding of load-transfer mechanisms in multileaf masonry walls: Testing and modelling. Eng. Struct (2006) 28: 1132–1148.
[11] Oliveira, D.V. and Lourenço, P.B. Experimental behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls The construction aspects of built heritage protection, Dubrovnik, Croatia 2006 (2006) 356–362.
[12] BS EN 1052-1:1999 Methods of test for masonry. Determination of compressive strength, BSI.
[13] Thamboo, J.A. and Dhanasekar, M. Assessment of the characteristics of lime mortar bonded brickwork wallettes under monotonic and cyclic compression. Const. Build. Mater (2020) 261: 120003.
[14] Nazir, S. and Dhanasekar, M. Modelling the failure of thin layered mortar joints in masonry. Eng. Struct (2013) 49: 615–627.
[15] Bolhassani, M., Hamid, A. A., Lau, A.C.W. and Moon, F. Simplified micro modelling of partially grouted masonry assemblages. Constr. Build. Mater (2015) 83:159–173.
[16] ABAQUS, Finite element software documentation, Dassault Systèmes, Simulia RI, USA, 2018.
[17] Zahra, T. and Dhanasekar, M. Characterisation and strategies for mitigation of the contact surface unevenness in dry-stack masonry. Constr. Build. Mater (2018) 169: 612– 628.
[18] ASTM C1314 – 14 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms, ASTM International, USA.
Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21
Volume Inspection methods, non-destructive techniques and laboratory testing, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.055
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?