Latest revision as of 12:53, 30 November 2021

Abstract

Timber structures represent a rich although still underestimated portion of the historical built asset worldwide documenting a tradition of sustainable practices and craftsmanship. Assessment of their condition is a fundamental step towards their conservation. While some overarching approaches for the assessment of timber structures are not dissimilar to those used for other types of structures, there are some specific factors affecting timber structures behavior that should be taken into consideration. Such factors are especially related to the organic nature of wood, which makes timber’s properties largely variable and influenced by the environment. Successful conservation of historical timber structures requires combination of many different disciplinary contributions, from wood science and technology, to structural engineering, building physics, architecture, art history and environmental science, among others. This contribution aims to present an overview of tools supporting decision-making processes for the assessment and conservation of existing timber structures, including both methodological frameworks and technical approaches for data collection and analysis. These tools are reviewed according to the scope of the assessment and considering multiple levels at which timber structures are studied, at the material, system and building scale. Additionally, emerging approaches and challenges for holistic assessment of historical timber structures are discussed.

Full document

References

[1] Borri, A, Corradi, M. (2019). Architectural Heritage: A Discussion on Conservation and Safety. Heritage 2019, 2, 631–647; doi:10.3390/heritage2010041

[2] Morkunaite, Z, Kalibatas, D, Kalibatiene, D. (2019). A bibliometric data analysis of multi- criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 25. 76-99. 10.3846/jcem.2019.8315.

[3] Bertolin, C, Loli, A. (2018). Sustainable interventions in historic buildings: a developing decision making tool. Journal of Cultural Heritage 34 (2018) 291–302.

[4] Pozzi, M, Kiureghian, A.D. 2011. Assessing the Value of Information for long-term structural health monitoring. Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2011. 7984, (2011).

[5] Riggio, M, Dilmaghani, M. (2019) Structural health monitoring of timber buildings: A review of monitoring projects and lessons learned”. Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1681253

[6] Riggio, M, D’Ayala, D, Parisi, MA, Tardini, C. (2018). Assessment of heritage timber structures: Review of standards, guidelines and procedures. Journal of Cultural Heritage 31, 220-235.

[7] SIA 269/5:2011, Existing Structures – Timber Structures, Schweizer Norm,Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects, Zurich, Switzerland, 2011.

[8] Cruz, H, Yeomans, D, Tsakanika, E, Macchioni, N, Jorissen, A, Touza, M, Mannucci, M, Lourenço, PB. (2015). Guidelines for on-site assessment of historic timber structures, Int. J. Architect. Herit. 9 (3): 277–289.

[9] Macchioni, N., Feio, A. Ruisinger, U., Saporiti, J., Tsakanika, E., Yeomans, D. (2019). The prEN 17121: Historic Timber Structures – Guidelines for the on-site assessment of load- bearing timber structures. SHATIS’2019. 25-27 September 2019, Guimarães, Portugal.

[10] UNI 11119:2004, Cultural Heritage – Wooden Artefacts – Load Bearing Structures of Buildings. Criteria for the Preliminary Evaluation, Design and Execution Works, UNI (Ente nazionale italiano di unificazione), 2004 (in Italian).

[11] Serafini, A., Riggio, M., González-Longo, C. (2017). A Database Model for the Analysis and Assessment of Historic Timber Roof Structures. International Wood Products Journal. Assessment, Reinforcement and Monitoring of Timber Structures: Research outputs from the COST ACTION FP1101. 8 (1): 3-8.

[12] Baggio, C., et al. 2007. Field Manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures (AeDES). European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen.

[13] Frese, M., Blas, H. J., 2011. Statistics of damages to timber structures in Germany, Engineering Structures, 33, 2969-2977.

[14] Toratti, T. 2011. Proposal for a failure assessment template. Engineering Structures. 33: 2958–2961.

[15] Hansson, E. F. 2011. Analysis of structural failures in timber structures: typical causes for failure and failure modes. Engineering Structures. 33: 2978–2982.

[16] Parisi, M. A., Chesi, C. and Tardini, C. 2013. Seismic vulnerability of timber roof structures: classification criteria. Advanced Materials Research. 778: 1088–1095.

[17] Žnidarič ,A. (2013) e-bridge – Bridge Inspection Software, Technical Background, V0.5, Slovenian National Building And Civil Engineering Institute.

[18] Pazlar, T., Kramar, M. (2014) Assessment of Timber Bridges in Slovenia. Proceedings of the COST Timber Bridge Conference - CTBC 2014. 25–26 September 2014. Bern University of Applied Sciences. Biel, Switzerland.

[19] Cacciotti, R., Blaško, M., Valach, J. (2015) A diagnostic ontological model fordamages to historical constructions. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 16 (1): 40-48.

[20] Novelli, VI, and D’Ayala D. (2015). LOG-IDEAH: LOGic trees for identification of damage due to earthquakes for architectural heritage, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (1) 153- 176.

[21] D’Ayala, D, Speranza, E. (2003). Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings, Earthquake Spectra 19 (3) 479–509.

[22] D’Ayala, D, Galasso, C, Putrino, V, Fanciullacci, D, Barucco, P, Fanciullacci, V, Bronzino, C, Zerrudo, E, Manalo, M, Fradiquela, C, Regalado, J. (2016). Assessment of the Multi-Hazard Vulnerability of Priority Cultural Heritage Structures in the Philippines, in: ICONHIC 2016, Chania, Crete.

[23] Riggio, M, Anthony, RW, Augelli, F, Kasal, B, Lechner, T, Muller, W, Tannert, T. (2014). In situ assessment of structural timber using non‐destructive techniques. Materials and Structures 47(5), 749‐766.

[24] Tannert, T, Anthony, RW, Kasal, B, Kloiber, M, Piazza, M, Riggio, M, Rinn, F, Widmann, R, Yamaguchi, N. (2014). In situ assessment of structural timber using semi‐destructive techniques. Materials and Structures 47(5), 767‐785.

[25] Dackermann, U, Crews, K, Kasal, B, Li, J, Riggio, M, Rinn, F, Tannert, T (2014). In situ assessment of structural timber using stress‐wave measurements. Materials and Structures, 47(5), 787‐803.

[26] Fridley, KJ, Tang, RC, Soltis, LA, Yoo, CH (1992) Hygrothermal effects on load-duration behavior of structural lumber, J. Struct. Eng. 118 (4): 1023–1038.

[27] Fragiacomo, M, Fortino, S, Tononi, D, Usardi, I, Toratti, T. (2011). Moisture-induced stresses perpendicular to grain in cross-sections of timber members exposed to different climates, Engineering Structures 33 (2011) 3071–3078.

[28] Dietsch, P, Franke, S, Franke, B, Gamper, A, Winter, S. (2014). Methods to determine wood moisture content and their applicability in monitoring concepts. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 5(2):115–127

[29] Schmidt, E, Riggio, M. (2019). Monitoring Moisture Performance of Cross‐Laminated Timber Building Elements during Construction. Buildings, 9, 144

[30] Ludwig, N, Redaelli, V, Rosina, E, Augelli, F. (2004). Moisture detection in wood and plater by IR thermography. Infrared Physics & Technology. 46 (1-2): 161-166

[31] Riggio, M, Sandak, J, Franke, S. (2015). Application of imaging techniques for detection of defects, damage and decay in timber structures on‐site. Constr. Build. Mater., 101, 1241– 1252.

[32] Riggio, M, Macchioni, N, Riminesi, C. (2017). Structural health assessment of historical timber structures combining non‐destructive techniques: The roof of Giotto’s bell tower in Florence. Struct. Control Health Monit.,. 24 (7)

[33] Riggio, M, Piazza, M. (2011). Hardness Test. In Situ Assessment of Structural Timber: Discussion of Classical and Modern Non‐Destructive and Semi‐Destructive Methods for the Evaluation of Wood Structures. 7: 85‐95.

[34] Hunt, MO, Ross, RJ, Wang. W, Soltis, LA. (2007). Assessment of in-place wood floor systems. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 13 (1) 30-35

[35] Kloiber, M, Drdacky ́, M, Machado, JS, Piazza, M, Yamaguchi, N. (2015). Prediction of mechanical properties by means of semi-destructive methods: A review. Constr. Build.Mater. 101 (2): 215–1234.

[36] Íñiguez-González, G, Arriaga, F, Esteban, M, Llana, DL. (2015). Reference conditions and modification factors for the standardization of nondestructive variables used in the evaluation of existing timber structures. . Constr. Build. Mater. 101 (2015) 1166–1171

[37] Morales-Conde MJ, Machado, JS. (2017). Evaluation of cross-sectional variation of timber bending modulus of elasticity by stress waves. Constr. Build. Mater. 134 (1): 617-625

[38] Feio, A, Machado, JS. (2015). In-situ assessment of timber structural members: Combining information from visual strength grading and NDT/SDT methods–A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 101 (2) 1157-1165

[39] Curling, S, Clausen, C, Winandy, J. (2002). Relationships between mechanical properties, weight loss, and chemical composition of wood during incipient brown-rot decay. Forest products journal, 52, 34.

[40] Machado, JS, Riggio, M, D’Ayala, D. (2015). Assessment of structural timber members by non-and semi-destructive methods. Constr. Build. Mater. (101), 1155–1156.

[41] Sandak, A, Sandak, J, Riggio, M. (2016) Assessment of wood structural members degradation by means of infrared spectroscopy: an overview. Struct. Control Health Monit., 23 ( 3)

[42] Sandak, J, Sandak, A, Riggio, M. (2015). Characterization and monitoring of surface weathering on exposed timber structures with a multi-sensor approach. Int. J. Architect. Herit., 9(6), 674–688.

[43] Fontul, S, SOll, M, Cruz, H, Machado, JS, Pajewski, L. (2018). Ground penetrating radar investigations in the Noble Hall of São Carlos Theater in Lisbon, Portugal. Survey in Geophysics 39 (6), 1125-1147.

[44] Cantini, L, Tedeschi, C, Tiraboschi, C, Binda, L. (2012).Use of thermovision for the survey of a timber vault in Torino, in: O. Büyüköztürk et al. (Eds.), Nondestructive Testing of Materials and Structures, RILEM Book series 6, pp.1203–1208. RILEM 2012.

[45] Cabaleiro, M, Branco JM, Sousa HS, Conde B (2018). First results on the combination of laser scanner and drilling resistance tests for the assessment of the geometrical condition of irregular cross-sections of timber beams. Materials and Structures, 51 (99)

[46] Logothestis, S., Delinasiou, A., Stylianidis, E. (2015). Building information modelling for cultural heritage: a review. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume II-5/W3, 2015

[47] Lee, J, Kim, J, Ahn, J, Woo, W. (2018). Mobile Risk Management for Wooden Architectural Heritage in Korea using HBIM and VR. (DigitalHERITAGE 2018) & (VSMM 2018), 26-30 Oct. 2018, San Francisco, CA, USA.

[48] Bassier, M, Hadjidemetriou, G, Vergauwen, M, Van Roy, N, Verstrynge E. (2016). Implementation of Scan-to-BIM and FEM for the Documentation and Analysis of Heritage Timber Roof Structures. EuroMed 2016, Part I, LNCS 10058; 79–90.