Latest revision as of 12:52, 30 November 2021

Abstract

Recent seismic events occurred in areas rich of ancient remains and full of cultural and artistic heritage in terms of artworks. Earthquakes may damage buildings, but the vibrations may also induce the uplift and overturning of their content, implying irreparable loss of cultural values. The seismic assessment of objects is usually tackled modelling them as rigid blocks. This paper focuses on statues, which generally present a very complicated geometry, and proposes a general methodology involving different disciplines, for their experimental seismic assessment. The methodology is here applied to the masterpiece of “Paolo Orsi” museum in Syracuse (Italy), that is the “Venere Landolina”. Due to the complexity of statues, traditional techniques cannot be considered reliable for a proper geometry reconstruction; therefore, Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) and Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) technologies are here employed to obtain a highly detailed and complete digital model. Aiming at providing a low-cost scaled physical model of the statue, a wooden specimen has been arranged employing a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machine, cutting off disks from flat panels which are then superimposed and glued, progressively reconstructing the actual geometry of the statue. The specimen, able to approximately reproduce the scaled actual geometry, was then tested on a shaking table with ground motions compatible with those expected for the site where the statue is located. The obtained results are finally correlated with those expected for the real scale statue.

Full document

References

[1] Borri, A. and Grazini, A. Diagnostic analysis of the lesions and stability of Michelangelo’s David. Journal of Cultural Heritage (2006) 7:273-285.

[2] Cerri, G., Pirazzoli, G., Tanganelli, M., Verdiani, G., Rotunno, T., Pintucchi, B. and Viti, S. Seismic Assessment of Artefacts: The Case of Juno's Fountain of the National Museum of Bargello. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2018) 364, 012057.

[3] Housner, G.W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am. (1963) 53:404-417.

[4] Aslam, M., Godden, W. G. and Scalise, D. T. Earthquake Rocking Response of Rigid Bodies (1978) Lawrence Berkley Laboratory.

[5] Giannini, R., Giuffre, A. and Masiani, R. La dinamica delle strutture composte di blocchi sovrapposti: studi in corso sulla colonna Antoniana, VIII Congresso nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di meccanica Teorica ed Applicata, 1986, Turin, Italy 29- September – 3 October, 1:299-304.

[6] Spanos, P.D., Di Matteo, A., Pirrotta, A. and Di Paola, M. Nonlinear rocking of rigid block on flexible foundation: analysis and experiments. Procedia Engineering (2017) 199:284– 289.

[7] Ioannis, N., Psycharis, N. and Jennings, P.C. Upthrow of objects due to horizontal impulse excitation, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1985) 75(2):543-561.

[8] Chatzis, M.N., and Smyth, A.W. Robust Modeling of the Rocking Problem. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (2012) 138(3) 247-262.

[9] Spanos, P.D. and Koh, A.S. Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic shaking. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (1984) 110(11):1627-1642.

[10] Shenton III, H.W. and Jones, N.P. Base excitation of rigid bodies. I: formulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (1991) 117(10):2286-2306.

[11] Cocuzza Avellino, G., Caliò, I., Cannizzaro, F., Caddemi, S. and Impollonia, N. Response spectra of rigid blocks with uncertain behaviour. COMPDYN 2019 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis (eds.) Crete, Greece, 24–26 June 2019.

[12] Jeong, M.Y., Lee, H., Kim, J.H. and Yang, I.Y. Chaotic behavior on rocking vibration of rig-id body block structure under two-dimensional sinusoidal excitation (in the case of no sliding). KSME International Journal (2003) 17(9):1249-1260.

[13] Di Egidio, A., and Contento, A. Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a con-strained oscillating base. Engineering Structures (2010) 32:3028–3039.

[14] De Canio G. Basi antisismiche in marmo per i Bronzi di Riace. Archeomatica (2011) 2(1).

[15] Caliò, I. and Marletta, M. Passive control of the seismic rocking response of art objects, Engineering Structures (2003) 25:1009–1018.

[16] Donà, M., Hugh Muhr, A., Tecchio, G. and da Porto, F. Experimental characterization, design and modelling of the RBRLseismic-isolation system for lightweight structures. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn (2017) 46:831–853.

[17] Podany, J. An Overview of Seismic Damage Mitigation for Museums. International Symposium on Advances of Protection Devices for Museum Exhibits, April 13-17, 2015 Beijing and Shanghai China.

[18] Valenti, R., Paternò E., 2017. The Itineraries of Drawing: from museum works to art places. In: Territories and frontiers of representation, p. 1307-1314, Roma:Gangemi Editore, ISBN: 978-88-492-3507-4

[19] Valenti, R., Paternò E., 2020. Imagined spaces in church architectural furnishings: Solomon’s temple in small scale architectural language. In: Advances in Utopian Studies and Sacred Architecture, Cham: Springer, in press.

[20] Remondino, F., Barazzetti, L., Nex, F., Scaioni, M., Sarazzi, D., 2011. UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3d modeling -current status and future perspectives -. In: ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXVIII-1, pp. 25-31 https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-25-2011

[21] Bolognesi, M., Furini, A., Russo, V., Pellegrinelli, A., Russo, P., 2014. Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry. In: ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5, pp. 113-119

[22] Aicardi, I., Chiabrando, F., Grasso, N., Lingua, A. M., Noardo, F., Spanò, A. T., 2016. UAV photogrammetry with oblique images: First analysis on data acquisition and processing. In: ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI, pp. 835-842

[23] Carnevali, L., Ippoliti, E., Lanfranchi, F., Menconero, S., Russo, M., Russo, V., 2018. Close-range mini-UAVs photogrammetry for architecture survey. In: ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2, pp. 217-224

[24] D. Brown, C. Wolfgang, Simulating what you see: combining computer modeling with video analysis, MPTL 16 – HSCI 2011, Ljubljana 15 -17 September 2011.

[25] Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti, Decreto 17 gennaio 2018, Aggiornamento delle "Norme tecniche per le costruzioni" – NTC18

[26] Linee guida per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008

[27] Seismosoft 2020 "SeismoArtif - A computer program for generation of artificial accelerograms". Available from URL: www.seismosoft.com.

[28] Sandro Longo, Analisi dimensionale e modellistica fisica. Principi e applicazioni alle scienze ingegneristiche, Springer-Verlag, Italia 2011