Latest revision as of 12:51, 30 November 2021

Abstract

This paper presents a digital tool for the rapid structural assessment of historic masonry domes. It is especially suited for masonry domes that present long meridian cracks, ergo each partitioned element governed by a pushing failure mode. The proposed procedure considers a Heyman’s no-tension mechanical model has been implemented within a commercial user-friendly visual programming environment. The numerical approach consists of a parametric modelling of the failure mechanism and, therefore, exploring the domain of possible solutions using the theorems of the limit analysis. Hence, a heuristic search method is subsequently adopted to refine the geometry of the collapse mechanism and to compute the value of the horizontal trust. The validation of the developed approach has been achieved considering the Saint Peter’s dome. As reported in the literature, the behaviour of the Saint Peter’s dome gradually shifted from a rigid shell-type – stiffened by hoop stresses –, towards a pushing type of dome partitioned by long meridian cracks. The study also evaluated the structural integrity of the drum. In converse with more time-consuming and advanced methods of analysis, the present procedure allows the users to perform a structural assessment of a historic masonry dome in a fast and computationally efficient manner. The developed digital tool will be freely available from a web archive hosted by the University of Minho and, therefore, easily able to reach students, researchers and structural engineers.

Full document

References

[1] Stepinac, M., et al., Methods for the assessment of critical properties in existing masonry structures under seismic loads-the ARES project. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2020. 10(5).

[2] Porter, D.W., et al., Material and seismic assessment of the great house at casa grande ruins national monument, arizona. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 2020. 26(1).

[3] Morici, M., et al., Empirical predictive model for seismic damage of historical churches. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020. 18(13): p. 6015-6037.

[4] Olivito, R.S., et al. A numerical-geometrical methodology to represent out-of-plane mechanisms of unreinforced masonry structures by using pushover analysis. in COMPDYN Proceedings. 2019.

[5] Fortunato, G., Funari, M.F., and Lonetti, P., Survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Tumba (Italy). Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2017. 26: p. 64-78.

[6] Savalle, N., Vincens, É., and Hans, S., Experimental and numerical studies on scaled-down dry-joint retaining walls: Pseudo-static approach to quantify the resistance of a dry-joint brick retaining wall. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020. 18(2): p. 581- 606.

[7] Mehrotra, A., Arede, A., and DeJong, M.J., Discrete element modeling of a post-tensioned masonry arch. Civil-Comp Proceedings, 2015.

[8] Cascardi, A., et al. Structural analysis of a masonry church with variable cross-section dome. in Brick and Block Masonry-From Historical to Sustainable Masonry: Proceedings of the 17th International Brick/Block Masonry Conference (17thIB2MaC 2020), July 5-8, 2020, Kraków, Poland. 2020. CRC Press.

[9] Silva, L.C., et al., Seismic Structural Assessment of the Christchurch Catholic Basilica, New Zealand. Structures, 2018. 15: p. 115-130.

[10] Bacigalupo, A., Brencich, A., and Gambarotta, L., A simplified assessment of the dome and drum of the Basilica of S. Maria Assunta in Carignano in Genoa. Engineering Structures, 2013. 56: p. 749-765.

[11] Bartoli, G., Betti, M., and Borri, C., Numerical modeling of the structural behavior of Brunelleschi’s Dome of Santa Maria del Fiore. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2015. 9(4): p. 408-429.

[12] Cavalagli, N. and Gusella, V., Dome of the basilica of santa maria degli angeli in Assisi: Static and dynamic assessment. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2015. 9(2): p. 157-175.

[13] Bretas, E.M., Lemos, J.V., and Lourenço, P.B., A DEM based tool for the safety analysis of masonry gravity dams. Engineering structures, 2014. 59: p. 248-260.

[14] Boni, C., et al. DEM modelling of masonry vaults: influence of brick pattern and infill on stability during supports displacements. in Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia. 2019. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS).

[15] Anselmi, C., Galizia, F., and Saetta, E., 3D limit analysis of masonry pavilion domes on octagonal drum subjected to vertical loads. Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 2020. 14(51): p. 486-503.

[16] Casapulla, C., Mousavian, E., and Zarghani, M., A digital tool to design structurally feasible semi-circular masonry arches composed of interlocking blocks. Computers and Structures, 2019. 221: p. 111-126.

[17] Funari, M.F., et al., Visual programming for structural assessment of out-of-plane mechanisms in historic masonry structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020. 31.

[18] Como, M., Statics of historic masonry constructions. Vol. 1. 2013: Springer.

[19] Feizolahbeigi, A., et al., Discussion of the role of geometry, proportion and construction techniques in the seismic behavior of 16th to 18th century bulbous discontinuous double shell domes in central Iran. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 33.

[20] Gregson, S., Nelder-Mead Optimisation (EOC), https://www.eocengineers.com/en/news/digital-design-group-tackles-classic- engineering-problem 2018.

[21] Le Seur, T., Jacquier, F., and Boscovich, R., Parere di Tre Matematici Sopra i danni, che si sono trovati nella cupola di San Pietro sul fine dell'anno MDCCXLII. Dato per ordine di Nostro Signore Papa Benedetto XIV, Roma. 1742.

[22] Poleni, G., Memorie istoriche della gran cvpola

[23] Baldrati, B., LA CUPOLA DELLA BASILICA DI SAN PIETRO IN VATICANO. IL CANTIERE E IL SISTEMA COSTRUTTIVO. 2009.