Latest revision as of 20:48, 22 March 2021

Abstract

The critical and follow-up headways are the two gap-acceptance parameters which explain the traffic interaction of a minor street vehicle when enters the roundabout, merging into or crossing one or more circulating (major) streams. Several studies and researches provide measurements of critical and follow-up headways from real data at roundabouts. The objective of our research is to synthesize the data from the series of selected studies to interpret variation across the studies. In order to match the research goal, a systematic literature review on estimations of critical and follow-up headways at roundabouts was undertaken. Since several studies and researches developed worldwide were examined, we were able to note that the effect size varied from study to study. Thus the meta-analysis of effect sizes was performed as part of the literature review through the random-effects model. After discussing the assumptions of this model, the dispersion in effects across studies was assessed and the summary effect for each of the parameters under examination was computed. Calculations were made both for single-lane roundabouts and double-lane roundabouts, as well as for turbo roundabouts. Compared to the results of individual studies, the single (quantitative) meta-analytic estimate provides an accurate and reliable synthesis on the specific issue here addressed, and gives, with greater power of the individual reviewed studies, a comprehensive measure for the parameters of interest.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by

• http://hdl.handle.net/10447/166044 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

• https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12544-015-0190-4.pdf

• http://hdl.handle.net/10447/166044,

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12544-015-0190-4 under the license cc-by

• http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4.pdf,

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4/fulltext.html,

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4

• https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12544-015-0190-4.pdf,

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4,

https://pure.unipa.it/it/publications/gap-accepteance-parameters-for-roundabouts-a-systematic-review-3,

https://core.ac.uk/display/81817688,

https://paperity.org/p/74739113/gap-accepteance-parameters-for-roundabouts-a-systematic-review,

https://etrr.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4,

https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s12544-015-0190-4,

https://iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/166044?mode=simple.24,

https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1376953,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2192149926 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0