(Created page with "== Abstract == The goal of this work is to design a nozzle system around the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) of a VVER-1000 nuclear reactor which would ensure successful melt r...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
− | The goal of this work is to design a nozzle system around the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) of a VVER-1000 nuclear reactor which would ensure successful melt retention during a severe accident. Simulations were performed with a multiphase model in ANSYS Fluent 19.1 to determine this. The results suggest that an efficient cooling can be achieved by inducing a flow rising parallel to the RPV walls in the flooded reactor cavity. In order to do this, it is proposed to use one central nozzle below the RPV and a ring of 32 nozzles 0.5 m above the RPV bottom. Assuming a 2 bar pressure, injection of 750 m | + | The goal of this work is to design a nozzle system around the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) of a VVER-1000 nuclear reactor which would ensure successful melt retention during a severe accident. Simulations were performed with a multiphase model in ANSYS Fluent 19.1 to determine this. The results suggest that an efficient cooling can be achieved by inducing a flow rising parallel to the RPV walls in the flooded reactor cavity. In order to do this, it is proposed to use one central nozzle below the RPV and a ring of 32 nozzles 0.5 m above the RPV bottom. Assuming a 2 bar pressure, injection of 750 m<sup>3</sup>/h water at 80<sup>o</sup>C through the nozzles led to little steam production and a heat flux below the critical value. |
== Full document == | == Full document == | ||
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_958664139p4868.pdf</pdf> | <pdf>Media:Draft_Content_958664139p4868.pdf</pdf> |
The goal of this work is to design a nozzle system around the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) of a VVER-1000 nuclear reactor which would ensure successful melt retention during a severe accident. Simulations were performed with a multiphase model in ANSYS Fluent 19.1 to determine this. The results suggest that an efficient cooling can be achieved by inducing a flow rising parallel to the RPV walls in the flooded reactor cavity. In order to do this, it is proposed to use one central nozzle below the RPV and a ring of 32 nozzles 0.5 m above the RPV bottom. Assuming a 2 bar pressure, injection of 750 m3/h water at 80oC through the nozzles led to little steam production and a heat flux below the critical value.
Published on 10/03/21
Submitted on 10/03/21
Volume 600 - Fluid Dynamics and Transport Phenomena, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.080
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?