(Created page with "== Abstract == In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size a...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of | + | In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of Dmax and DHr would |
| + | be a better indicator of rupture risk. | ||
== Full document == | == Full document == | ||
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_182315947p2638.pdf</pdf> | <pdf>Media:Draft_Content_182315947p2638.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:45, 11 March 2021
Abstract
In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of Dmax and DHr would be a better indicator of rupture risk.
Full document
Document information
Published on 10/03/21
Submitted on 10/03/21
Volume 400 - Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.230
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?