(Created page with "== Abstract == A parametric study of Multiple Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions is presented in this paper. All results were obtained using the Computational Fluid Dynam...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 647387240 to Boychev et al 2021a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 17:41, 11 March 2021

Abstract

A parametric study of Multiple Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions is presented in this paper. All results were obtained using the Computational Fluid Dynamics Solver of Glasgow University. Such interactions often occur in high-speed intakes, depending on the state of the upstream boundary layer, and can adversely affect the performance of the intake. First simulations of multiple shock wave boundary layer interaction in a rectangular duct were performed and compared to the experiments followed by simulations at different Mach and Reynolds numbers and flow confinement levels. The results showed that Reynolds-stress based turbulence models are better suited than linear turbulence models in predicting the interaction. The employed Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model showed good agreement for the corner and centreline separations and resulted only in a small underprediction of the wall pressure. Flow distortion and total pressure recovery efficiency metrics were defined and evaluated for each interaction. Lower upstream Mach number and/or lower levels of flow confinement were required to achieve higher total pressure recoveries and lower flow distortion levels.

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 11/03/21
Submitted on 11/03/21

Volume 2300 - STS - Aeronautics - Design, Methods and Tools, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/wccm-eccomas.2020.274
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 17
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?