(Created page with " == Abstract == Objective To investigate test-retest reliability of contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) from lower extremities using two different stimulation protocol...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 295852784 to Kramer et al 2018a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 12:22, 16 February 2021

Abstract

  Objective  To investigate test-retest reliability of contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) from lower extremities using two different stimulation protocols, i.e., normal and increased baseline temperature.    Methods  A total of 32 able-bodied subjects were included and a subset (N = 22) was retested. CHEPs were recorded from three different dermatomes of the lower extremity (i.e., L2, L5, and S2). Test-retest reliability of CHEPs acquisition after simulation in various lower limb dermatomes using different stimulation protocols was analyzed.    Results  The study revealed an improved acquisition of CHEPS employing the increased baseline protocol, particularly when stimulating more distal sites, i.e., dermatome L5 and S2. Based on repeatability coefficients, CHEP latency (N2 potential) emerged as the most robust CHEP parameter. Although CHEP amplitudes (N2P2 complex) and pain ratings were decreased in the retest, amplitudes still showed fair to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients using normal baseline or increased baseline temperature, respectively.    Conclusions  This is the first study to demonstrate that CHEPs acquisition from the lower extremities is improved by increasing the baseline temperature of the thermode.    Significance  This study highlights the usability of CHEPs as a viable diagnostic method to study small fiber integrity.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1388245718300014?httpAccept=text/plain,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.034 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/148706,
https://core.ac.uk/display/154259812,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2781523925
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2018

Volume 2018, 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.034
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 2
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?