(Created page with " == Abstract == In the case study "West-Flanders" costs of electricity and heat production are estimated if a dedicated biogas grid using pipelines would be implemented to ce...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 367170090 to Broekhuis et al 2020a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 10:55, 16 February 2021

Abstract

In the case study "West-Flanders" costs of electricity and heat production are estimated if a dedicated biogas grid using pipelines would be implemented to centralize energy production in a region. Heat may not be used effectively at digester sites, e.g. because of a change in treatment of digestate. A large scale centralized combined heat and power (CHP) engine can produce additional electrical power at a hub, i.e. central collection point, and has lower specific costs compared to decentralized CHPs at digester sites. A biogas transport model is used to calculate transport costs in a grid. These costs, partly balanced by a scale advantage in CHP costs, are attributed to the additional electrical energy (80%) and heat (20%) produced. If the hub is at a digester site, costs of additional electricity can be as low as 4.0 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and are in many cases below 12 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1), i.e. in the same order of magnitude or lower than costs of electricity from biogas produced using separate CHPs at the different digester sites; costs of heat at the hub show to be lower than 1 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1) assuming an effective heat use of 50%. In case a hub is situated at a location with high potential heat demand, i.e. a heat sink, transport of biogas from one digester only to a central located hub can provide 3.4 MWth of heat at 1.95 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). For such a centrally located hub additional electrical energy costs show to be slightly higher, but with three or more digesters these costs are lower than 20 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and heat costs are around 0.5 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). With a centralized hub more renewable energy is produced, i.e. a more efficient use of biomass feedstock. It is concluded that costs for additional electricity and heat can be at a competing level and scale advantages in a CHP can be a driver to collect biogas at a hub using a biogas grid. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0960148119318798?httpAccept=text/plain,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.009 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Apure.rug.nl%3Apublications%2Fabdb2322-b307-441d-9df1-5db716596fdf,
https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6786249,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2992523153
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2020

Volume 2020, 2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.009
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?