Latest revision as of 10:58, 15 February 2021

Abstract

This paper reviews a number of studies on both frequency-and schedule-based transit assignment models that have been proposed by far, wherein various behavioural assumptions on a wide range of aspects are embedded. With a reinvestigation on the relationships and homogeneity between different modelling approaches, it explores the representative veins of the models, and thereby extends a new perspective to the existing reviews under a historical context. Meanwhile, both advantages and disadvantages of these methods are presented. On the strength of the analyses and discussions of the state-of-the-art transit assignment models, further research directions are suggested.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.829 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

• http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84334/1/Hess_Procedia_2012.pdf

• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.829

• https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1877042812042917?httpAccept=text/xml,

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1877042812042917?httpAccept=text/plain,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.829 under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812042917,

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84334,

https://core.ac.uk/display/30269960,

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84334/1/Hess_Procedia_2012.pdf,

https://trid.trb.org/view/1254533,

https://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research/4655,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2018553365