(Created page with " == Abstract == Due to financial or administrative constraints, access to official spatial base data is currently limited to a small subset of all potential users in the fiel...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 228904353 to Hahmann et al 2013a) |
(No difference)
|
Due to financial or administrative constraints, access to official spatial base data is currently limited to a small subset of all potential users in the field of spatial planning and research. This increases the usefulness of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), in particular OpenStreetMap (OSM), as supplementary datasets or, in some cases, alternative sources of primary data. In contrast to the OSM street network, which has already been thoroughly investigated and found to be practically complete in many areas, the degree of completeness of OSM data on buildings is still unclear. In this paper we describe methods to analyze building completeness and apply these to various test areas in Germany. Official data from national mapping and cadastral agencies is used as a basis for comparison. The results show that unit-based completeness measurements (e.g., total number or area of buildings) are highly sensitive to disparities in modeling between official data and VGI. Therefore, we recommend object-based methods to study the completeness of OSM building footprint data. An analysis from November 2011 in Germany indicated a completeness of 25% in the federal states of North Rhine-Westphalia and 15% in Saxony. Although further analyses from 2012 confirm that data completeness in Saxony has risen to 23%, the rate of new data input was slowing in the year 2012.
Document type: Article
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Published on 01/01/2013
Volume 2013, 2013
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi2041066
Licence: Other
Are you one of the authors of this document?