Latest revision as of 14:23, 12 February 2021

Abstract

Introduction Competitive tendering was introduced in the contract segment of the Norwegian taxi industry in 2005; a market characterised by entry regulation. Using this reform as a natural experiment this research looks into how competitive tendering has resulted in different outcomes in different segments of the taxi market and which explanations are best at describing the results. Methods The main sources of data are the taximeter data and case studies, conducted as part of a study of the rural taxi industry in Norway. This data have been supplemented by interviews with key stakeholders and data on prices and volumes from various purchasers of transport services, such as health corporations and county governments. Results The empirical data shows a lot of variation. There are very different outcomes in the different cases studied. However, the research shows that competitive tendering has mostly worked according to intention in the most central regions. These are characterised by many potential suppliers and that the tendered contracts are relative small compared with the total size of the market. I rural areas the results differ, with poor results from tendering in the intermediate areas and mostly satisfactory results in the most rural areas. Conclusions Experience from the Norwegian taxi industry shows that competitive tendering is possible within entry-regulated markets. Still, there are issues that remain to be solved, in particular in rural areas. This is due to both interdependency between the purchaser and the service provider, and the size of the markets. For other sectors, the main lessons are that competitive tendering can work, even with regulated entry, but that it needs to be adapted to suit the characteristics of each market. This research shows that there is significant variation within a sector. A tool such as competitive tendering can be well suited in one area, but inappropriate in another. This research suggests that the outcome is related to both hard factors such as market size and number of entrants, but also to factors like interdependency and negotiation climate.

Document type: Article

Full document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by

• http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2602274 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

• https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12544-015-0166-4.pdf

• http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4/fulltext.html,

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4.pdf,

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4 under the license cc-by

• https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4,

https://etrr.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4,

https://trid.trb.org/view/1352167,

https://core.ac.uk/display/81748986,

https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s12544-015-0166-4,

https://toi.brage.unit.no/toi-xmlui/handle/11250/2602274,

https://paperity.org/p/61526773/competitive-tendering-in-an-entry-regulated-market-an-accident-waiting-to-happen,

http://www.ectri.org/YRS11/Documents/Final%20website/Session%206/YRS11_Session6_AarhaugTOI.pdf,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2073111752 under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0