(Created page with " == Abstract == Purpose This paper is a study of the user’s perception of urban and suburban transport and was carried out in an attempt to compare the social value of var...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 565626700 to Jalon et al 2019a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 13:29, 12 February 2021

Abstract

Purpose This paper is a study of the user’s perception of urban and suburban transport and was carried out in an attempt to compare the social value of various means of transport. The measurement of social perceptions is carried out with regard to ambient conditions, space, signs, front-line employees and other customers as stakeholders of both public transport services. Thus, this paper aims to identify the reasons for individuals’ preferences when choosing one particular means of transport for their daily life. Results The results show that user perceptions of the underground are slightly better than the perceptions of buses; the results also highlight the decent management of both means of transport in terms of quality air, temperature, space, noise, cleanliness, smell and seating facilities. Some modest improvements are recommended to enhance public transportation service delivery. Conclusions This approach reflects the gap between the social perception of a service and companies’ financial situations. Management policies are necessary to improve the service’s social value.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://doaj.org/toc/1867-0717,
https://doaj.org/toc/1866-8887 under the license cc-by
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0373-5/fulltext.html,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0373-5
https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12544-019-0373-5,
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-019-0373-5,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2957833444 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2019

Volume 2019, 2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12544-019-0373-5
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?