(Created page with " == Abstract == The emphasis in the term ‘Green Transportation’ is on the word ‘green’. Green transportation focuses on the construction of a slow transport system wi...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 400628541 to Zhu et al 2011a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 12:53, 12 February 2021

Abstract

The emphasis in the term ‘Green Transportation’ is on the word ‘green’. Green transportation focuses on the construction of a slow transport system with a visually pleasing, easy and secure trip environment composed of urban parks, green roadside spaces and some other space that is full of landscape plants. This trip environment encourages residents to make trip choices that reduce fuel consumption and pollution and is one of the most important ways of popularizing green transportation. To study the psychological benefits provided by urban parks and other landscape environments, we combined a subjective approach (a questionnaire) with an objective quantitative approach (emotional tests using an electroencephalogram

EEG). Using a questionnaire survey, we found that 90% of the subjects believed that landscape plants contribute to noise reduction and that 55% overrated the plants’ actual ability to attenuate noise. Two videos (showing a traffic scene and a plant scene) were shown to 40 participants on video glasses. We detected and recorded EEG values with a portable electroencephalograph, and a comparison between the results of the two groups revealed that there was a highly significant asymmetry between the EEG activity of the vegetation scene and traffic scene groups. The results suggest that the emotions aroused by noise and visual stimuli are manifested in the synchronization of beta frequency band and the desynchronization of alpha frequency band, indicating that landscape plants can moderate or buffer the effects of noise. These findings indicate that landscape plants provide excess noise attenuating effects through subjects’ emotional processing, which we term ‘psychological noise reduction’.

Document type: Article

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 under the license cc-by
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8041032
https://doaj.org/article/06c1fa762f764d68949dbeeb114dada9,
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/4/1032/pdf,
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3118876,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695027,
https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20113168083,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1990957019 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2011

Volume 2011, 2011
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8041032
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 4
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?