(Created page with " == Abstract == Presently, in the event of a failure in Automated Driving Systems, control architectures rely on hardware redundancies over software solutions to assure relia...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 598301564 to Matute-Peaspan et al 2020a) |
(No difference)
|
Presently, in the event of a failure in Automated Driving Systems, control architectures rely on hardware redundancies over software solutions to assure reliability or wait for human interaction in takeover requests to achieve a minimal risk condition. As user confidence and final acceptance of this novel technology are strongly related to enabling safe states, automated fall-back strategies must be assured as a response to failures while the system is performing a dynamic driving task. In this work, a fail-operational control architecture approach and dead-reckoning strategy in case of positioning failures are developed and presented. A fail-operational system is capable of detecting failures in the last available positioning source, warning the decision stage to set up a fall-back strategy and planning a new trajectory in real time. The surrounding objects and road borders are considered during the vehicle motion control after failure, to avoid collisions and lane-keeping purposes. A case study based on a realistic urban scenario is simulated for testing and system verification. It shows that the proposed approach always bears in mind both the passenger&rsquo
s safety and comfort during the fall-back maneuvering execution.
Document type: Article
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Published on 01/01/2020
Volume 2020, 2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20020442
Licence: Other
Are you one of the authors of this document?