(Created page with " == Abstract == Over the past 40 years, the number of people using bicycles as their primary means of transportation has increased significantly. Transportation agencies arou...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 384561013 to Stamatiadis et al 2018a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 14:19, 11 February 2021

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, the number of people using bicycles as their primary means of transportation has increased significantly. Transportation agencies around the world now promote bicycling as a way to reduce pollution and traffic congestion. However, the lack of bicycling infrastructure in many cities could significantly impede the future growth of bicycle usage. This paper used a web survey to evaluate the attitudes and preferences of bicyclists in two cities: Lexington, Kentucky, USA and Catania, Sicily, Italy. The goal of the survey was to document impediments to bicycling in both cities, determine how infrastructure could be improved, and identify features of smartphone app to aid bicyclists in route selection. Descriptive statistics and test of hypothesis were applied to the survey data to analyze participant responses and their level of agreement. Confirming previous research, respondents in both cities overwhelmingly cited lack of infrastructure as a major obstacle to bicycling more often. Respondents indicated that improving bicycle infrastructure and pavement conditions would result in an increased number of bicycle trips. Participants expressed a strong desire for a smartphone app that contains information on route safety level, a feature not currently available in any apps, which mainly provide route geometry information and distance between origin-destination pairs. While the survey findings lend support to the idea that bicyclists around the world harbor similar attitudes about what improvements are needed to increase cycling and enhance their experiences, local conditions and practices also influence perceptions about the relevance of specific issue.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_33 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_open/RZNM,
https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/RZNM,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2794847123


DOIS: 10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_33 10.29007/nrcn

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 11/12/18
Accepted on 11/12/18
Submitted on 11/12/18

Volume 2018, 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02305-8_33
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 1
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?