(Created page with " == Abstract == In this paper, Holding Stack Management (HSM), Continuous Climb Operations (CCO), Continuous Descent Operations (CDO), and Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) p...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 397603228 to Liu et al 2019c)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 20:03, 3 February 2021

Abstract

In this paper, Holding Stack Management (HSM), Continuous Climb Operations (CCO), Continuous Descent Operations (CDO), and Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) procedures are assessed in relation to the use of an additional 3D display. Two display seetings are compared, namely 2D+3D and 2D only. Twelve Air Traffic Control Officers (ATCOs) took part in the experiment. Traditional questionnaires such as NASA TLX, TRUST, etc. were given at the end of each 30-minute trial for each display setting. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during the experiments to continuously monitor the changes of the brain states of the ATCOs. The results of the data analyses show that by using 2D+3D display setting, more positive emotions, but higher stress and workload levels were experienced by ATCOs in TBO, CCO and CDO procedures than in 2D setting. In HSM, reduced stress and significantly lower cognitive workload were experienced by ATCOs when they were using 2D+3D setting.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_64 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2971517497
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2019

Volume 2019, 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_64
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 5
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?