(Created page with " == Abstract == SLAM has matured significantly over the past few years, and is beginning to appear in serious commercial products. While new SLAM systems are being proposed a...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 322952357 to Bodin et al 2016a) |
(No difference)
|
SLAM has matured significantly over the past few years, and is beginning to appear in serious commercial products. While new SLAM systems are being proposed at every conference, evaluation is often restricted to qualitative visualizations or accuracy estimation against a ground truth. This is due to the lack of benchmarking methodologies which can holistically and quantitatively evaluate these systems. Further investigation at the level of individual kernels and parameter spaces of SLAM pipelines is non-existent, which is absolutely essential for systems research and integration. We extend the recently introduced SLAMBench framework to allow comparing two state-of-the-art SLAM pipelines, namely KinectFusion and LSD-SLAM, along the metrics of accuracy, energy consumption, and processing frame rate on two different hardware platforms, namely a desktop and an embedded device. We also analyze the pipelines at the level of individual kernels and explore their algorithmic and hardware design spaces for the first time, yielding valuable insights.
Comment: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2016
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Published on 01/01/2016
Volume 2016, 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487261
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?