Latest revision as of 08:15, 2 February 2021

Abstract

In order to provide a control and non-payload communication (CNPC) link for civil-use unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) when operating in beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) conditions, satellite communication links are generally required. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has determined that the CNPC link must operate over protected aviation safety spectrum allocations. Although a suitable allocation exists in the 5030–5091 MHz band, no satellites provide operations in this band and none are currently planned. In order to avoid a very lengthy delay in the deployment of UAS in BLOS conditions, it has been proposed to use existing satellites operating in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), of which many operate in several spectrum bands. Regulatory actions by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) are needed to enable such a use on an international basis, and indeed Agenda Item (AI) 1.5 for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) was established to decide on the enactment of possible regulatory provisions. As part of the preparation for AI 1.5, studies on the sharing FSS bands between existing services and CNPC for UAS are being contributed by NASA and others. These studies evaluate the potential impact of satellite CNPC transmitters operating from UAS on other in-band services, and on the potential impact of other in-band services on satellite CNPC receivers operating on UAS platforms. Such studies are made more complex by the inclusion of what are essentially moving FSS earth stations, compared to typical sharing studies between fixed elements. Hence, the process of determining the appropriate technical parameters for the studies meets with difficulty. In order to enable a sharing study to be completed in a less-than-infinite amount of time, the number of parameters exercised must be greatly limited. Therefore, understanding the impact of various parameter choices is accomplished through selectivity analyses. In the case of sharing studies for AI 1.5, identification of worst-case parameters allows the studies to be focused on worst-case scenarios with assurance that other parameter combinations will yield comparatively better results and therefore do not need to be fully analyzed. In this paper, the results of such sensitivity analyses are presented for the case of sharing between UAS CNPC satellite transmitters and terrestrial receivers using the Fixed Service (FS) operating in the same bands, and the implications of these analyses on sharing study results.

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• https://zenodo.org/record/1271181 under the license https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/

• https://zenodo.org/record/1271181/files/article.pdf

• http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/7118533/7121207/07121272.pdf?arnumber=7121272,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnsurv.2015.7121272 under the license cc0

• http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/7118533/7121207/07121353.pdf?arnumber=7121353,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnsurv.2015.7121353

• https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150011446,

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7121272,

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7121272,

https://repository.exst.jaxa.jp/dspace/handle/a-is/549445,

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150011446,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1820066743

DOIS: 10.1109/icnsurv.2015.7121353 10.1109/icnsurv.2015.7121272