Latest revision as of 22:20, 1 February 2021

Abstract

Meeting the national infrastructure challenges will require that an answer to the question posed by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE): "How can the processes be more effective, more quality conscious, more flexible, simpler, and less expensive?" In this paper, the authors share one approach to identify solutions meeting the "simpler" characteristic of NAE's question. Through an interdisciplinary literature review, the authors characterize "elegant" solutions—those that meet user needs with minimal complexity. Whereas elegance can appear simple in hindsight, it represents a deeper understanding of the actual problem. As with other project outcomes, elegance is dependent on infrastructure project delivery processes: an owner who contracts with a designer to provide a reduction in traffic is encouraging a more elegant solution than an owner who specifies that the designer must add an additional lane. Behavioral scientists have developed choice architecture theory, which is being applied to improve decision processes in fields from medicine to law to finance. The authors believe choice architecture also could be used to arrange infrastructure delivery processes to encourage elegance. The authors describe the reasoning by connecting behavioral science theory and common infrastructure project delivery scenarios. The authors hope this paper begins a discussion to identify and motivate future research in this area.

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

• http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4877/0d699fa4fd0cc69bd35c03d2828b0710d52d.pdf

• http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/9780784413517.059,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784413517.059

• https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413517.059,

http://sipb.sggw.pl/CRC2014/data/papers/9780784413517.059.pdf,

https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1309080,

https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1963836189