(Created page with " == Abstract == We analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian network for natural gas. Two pipelines, “Nord Stream...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 759432396 to Hubert Cobanli 2014a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:58, 28 January 2021

Abstract

We analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian network for natural gas. Two pipelines, “Nord Stream” and “South Stream,” allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. The third project, “Nabucco,” aims at diversifying Europe’s gas imports by accessing producers in Middle East and Central Asia. If network power is measured with the Shapley Value we obtain a clear ranking of the projects which corresponds to the observed investment patterns. Nord Stream’s strategic value is huge, easily justifying the high investment cost for Germany and Russia. The additional leverage obtained through South Stream is much smaller and Nabucco is not viable. For the nucleolus in contrast, none of the pipelines has any strategic relevance at all, which contradicts the empirical evidence on investment.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2015.14.issue-2/rne-2016-0011/rne-2016-0011.pdf,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0011
https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100596,
http://www.ms-hns.de/files/publications/pipeline-power-2014.pdf,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2276891205
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2014

Volume 2014, 2014
DOI: 10.1515/rne-2016-0011
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 3
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?