(Created page with " == Abstract == International audience; Recent research on maritime ports hinterlands points out the relevance of mass ground transport modes such as barge transport for enor...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
  
International audience; Recent research on maritime ports hinterlands points out the relevance of mass ground transport modes such as barge transport for enormous flows of containers to and from harbours, especially when a maritime port is located at the mouth of a river. Though, the modal share of container barge transport in French maritime ports (9% of TEU in Le Havre and 5% in Marseille in 2007) is significantly lower than elsewhere (32% in Rotterdam and 33% in Antwerp). Some reports and studies explain the viscosity of container barge transport flows as a result of several factors, generally concentrated around the seaport community. In continuation of previous seminal works, this paper adopts a neo-institutional approach (Williamson, 1985; 1996) of container barge transport to understand how the factors generating this viscosity are managed. Section 2 describes the characteristics of the transaction of container barge transport. Section 3 is devoted to its attributes (asset specificity, frequency, uncertainty). According to Williamson’s (1996) remediableness criterion, the observed governance structure of a given transaction is presumed efficient and aligned to its attributes. Thus, Section 4 deals with observed governance structures of container barge transport chains with a focus on Le Havre, main French container seaport and shows how agents try to limit opportunism in ex-post haggling over quasi-rents or under-investments. Implementation of a new institutional environment to modify governance structures is analysed, and a comparison with currently implemented governance structures observed in Rhine is made. Finally, Section 5 suggests ways of dealing with the remaining coordination problems impeding the development of container barge transport in France.
+
International audience; Recent research on maritime ports hinterlands points out the relevance of mass ground transport modes such as barge transport for enormous flows of containers to and from harbours, especially when a maritime port is located at the mouth of a river. Though, the modal share of container barge transport in French maritime ports (9% of TEU in Le Havre and 5% in Marseille in 2007) is significantly lower than elsewhere (32% in Rotterdam and 33% in Antwerp). Some reports and studies explain the viscosity of container barge transport flows as a result of several factors, generally concentrated around the seaport community. In continuation of previous seminal works, this paper adopts a neo-institutional approach (Williamson, 1985; 1996) of container barge transport to understand how the factors generating this viscosity are managed. Section 2 describes the characteristics of the transaction of container barge transport. Section 3 is devoted to its attributes (asset specificity, frequency, uncertainty). According to Williamson’s (1996) remediableness criterion, the observed governance structure of a given transaction is presumed efficient and aligned to its attributes. Thus, Section 4 deals with observed governance structures of container barge transport chains with a focus on Le Havre, main French container seaport and shows how agents try to limit opportunism in ex-post haggling over quasi-rents or under-investments. Implementation of a new institutional environment to modify governance structures is analysed, and a comparison with currently implemented governance structures observed in Rhine is made. Finally, Section 5 suggests ways of dealing with the remaining coordination problems impeding the development of container barge transport in France.
  
  

Latest revision as of 21:38, 28 January 2021

Abstract

International audience; Recent research on maritime ports hinterlands points out the relevance of mass ground transport modes such as barge transport for enormous flows of containers to and from harbours, especially when a maritime port is located at the mouth of a river. Though, the modal share of container barge transport in French maritime ports (9% of TEU in Le Havre and 5% in Marseille in 2007) is significantly lower than elsewhere (32% in Rotterdam and 33% in Antwerp). Some reports and studies explain the viscosity of container barge transport flows as a result of several factors, generally concentrated around the seaport community. In continuation of previous seminal works, this paper adopts a neo-institutional approach (Williamson, 1985; 1996) of container barge transport to understand how the factors generating this viscosity are managed. Section 2 describes the characteristics of the transaction of container barge transport. Section 3 is devoted to its attributes (asset specificity, frequency, uncertainty). According to Williamson’s (1996) remediableness criterion, the observed governance structure of a given transaction is presumed efficient and aligned to its attributes. Thus, Section 4 deals with observed governance structures of container barge transport chains with a focus on Le Havre, main French container seaport and shows how agents try to limit opportunism in ex-post haggling over quasi-rents or under-investments. Implementation of a new institutional environment to modify governance structures is analysed, and a comparison with currently implemented governance structures observed in Rhine is made. Finally, Section 5 suggests ways of dealing with the remaining coordination problems impeding the development of container barge transport in France.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6_5
https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0040162512002946?httpAccept=text/plain,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.009
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00741127/document,
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00741127/file/Fischman_and_Lendjel_2012_SSS_Full_Paper_Template.pdf
https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/halshs-00741127.html,
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01071212,
https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/halcesptp/halshs-00741127.htm,
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6_5/fulltext.html,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1481952953
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6,
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v80y2013i7p1375-1386.html,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1967070234


DOIS: 10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.009 10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6_5

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2012

Volume 2012, 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09791-6
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?