(Created page with " == Abstract == This paper introduces the concept of using tactical shortcuts to improve arrival precision and thereby increase throughput. This concept schedules flights to...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 134589446 to Zelinski 2013b)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 18:30, 28 January 2021

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of using tactical shortcuts to improve arrival precision and thereby increase throughput. This concept schedules flights to a longer path for which a shortcut path option is available for time recovery when speed is restricted. Shortcut design parameter sensitivity for schedule-based and spacing-based use policies is explored for single vs. multiple shortcut designs and shortcut availability. Simulation results show schedule-based shortcuts can reduce scheduling buffer size by 35-55% (increasing maximum throughput) or reduce separation violation probability 15-20% (reducing controller workload). Spacing-based shortcuts can reduce scheduling buffer size or separation violation probability by an additional 20% or 5% respectively. Additional studies were conducted to evaluate throughput and delay performance of each shortcut use policy for a wide range of demand rates. Spacing-based shortcuts performed the best. A use policy that combined the schedule-based shortcut method and scheduling without shortcuts outperformed using either of these methods individually. The potential benefits of using tactical shortcuts warrants future study in its application to multi-point scheduling, performance-based operations, geometric design, and decision support tools.decision support tools.


Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2013.6712524 under the license cc0
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2013.6719601
https://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/publications/2013/DASC2013_Zelinski.pdf,
http://www.aviationsystems.arc.nasa.gov/publications/2013/DASC2013_Zelinski.pdf,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1978264111



DOIS: 10.1109/dasc.2013.6712524 10.1109/dasc.2013.6719601

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2013

Volume 2013, 2013
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2013.6712524
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

Keywords

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?