m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 543282624 to Avner Lall 2016a) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
− | Well-functioning cities reduce the economic distance between people and economic opportunities. Cities thrive because they enable matchmaking -- among people, among firms, and between people and job opportunities. This paper examines employment accessibility in Nairobi, Kenya and evaluates whether modification of land use patterns can contribute to increases in aggregate accessibility. The assessment is based on simulation of counterfactual scenarios of the location of jobs and households throughout the city without new investments in housing or transport infrastructure. The analysis finds that modifications to the spatial layout of Nairobi that encourage land use clustering can increase the share of overall opportunities that can be accessed within a given time-frame. When commuters travel by foot or using the minibus network, the share of accessible economic opportunities within an hour doubles from 11 to 21 percent and from 20 to 42 percent respectively. The analysis also finds that spatial layouts that maximize the number of households that have access to a minimum share of jobs, through a more even jobs-housing balance, come at the expense of average accessibility. This result is interpreted as a trade-off between inclusive and efficient labor markets. | + | Well-functioning cities reduce the economic distance between people and economic opportunities. Cities thrive because they enable matchmaking -- among people, among firms, and between people and job opportunities. This paper examines employment accessibility in Nairobi, Kenya and evaluates whether modification of land use patterns can contribute to increases in aggregate accessibility. The assessment is based on simulation of counterfactual scenarios of the location of jobs and households throughout the city without new investments in housing or transport infrastructure. The analysis finds that modifications to the spatial layout of Nairobi that encourage land use clustering can increase the share of overall opportunities that can be accessed within a given time-frame. When commuters travel by foot or using the minibus network, the share of accessible economic opportunities within an hour doubles from 11 to 21 percent and from 20 to 42 percent respectively. The analysis also finds that spatial layouts that maximize the number of households that have access to a minimum share of jobs, through a more even jobs-housing balance, come at the expense of average accessibility. This result is interpreted as a trade-off between inclusive and efficient labor markets. |
Document type: Book | Document type: Book | ||
== Full document == | == Full document == | ||
− | <pdf>Media: | + | <pdf>Media:Avner_Lall_2016a-beopen1672-9993-document.pdf</pdf> |
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/pdf/WPS7904.pdf http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/pdf/WPS7904.pdf] | * [http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/pdf/WPS7904.pdf http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/pdf/WPS7904.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7904] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25803 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25803] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2881697 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2881697], | ||
+ | : [https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-7904 https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-7904], | ||
+ | : [https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/Matchmaking-in-Nairobi-the-role-of-land-use https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716381480965677299/Matchmaking-in-Nairobi-the-role-of-land-use], | ||
+ | : [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25803 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25803], | ||
+ | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Avner_Lall_2016a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Avner_Lall_2016a], | ||
+ | : [https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7904.html https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/7904.html], | ||
+ | : [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/25803/1/WPS7904.pdf https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/10986/25803/1/WPS7904.pdf], | ||
+ | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2560161371 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2560161371] |
Well-functioning cities reduce the economic distance between people and economic opportunities. Cities thrive because they enable matchmaking -- among people, among firms, and between people and job opportunities. This paper examines employment accessibility in Nairobi, Kenya and evaluates whether modification of land use patterns can contribute to increases in aggregate accessibility. The assessment is based on simulation of counterfactual scenarios of the location of jobs and households throughout the city without new investments in housing or transport infrastructure. The analysis finds that modifications to the spatial layout of Nairobi that encourage land use clustering can increase the share of overall opportunities that can be accessed within a given time-frame. When commuters travel by foot or using the minibus network, the share of accessible economic opportunities within an hour doubles from 11 to 21 percent and from 20 to 42 percent respectively. The analysis also finds that spatial layouts that maximize the number of households that have access to a minimum share of jobs, through a more even jobs-housing balance, come at the expense of average accessibility. This result is interpreted as a trade-off between inclusive and efficient labor markets.
Document type: Book
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Published on 01/01/2016
Volume 2016, 2016
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7904
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?