(Created page with " == Abstract == Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications International audience Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications | + | Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications; International audience; Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to be missing is a reflection at the organizational or societal level about a policy of automation. By this we intend appropriate declarations made at the level of rationale, future plans and strategies to achieve intended goals and most importantly how those achievements will impact on various aspects of societal life, from legal responsibilities to moral and socio economic issues. In some public spheres these issues are becoming quite controversial because automation opens up possibilities of profound structural re-organization; however, we lack a discussion across and within different work domains to help us review methods or even methodological principles needed to gather and organize knowledge towards the construction of automation policies. This paper uses the UK service organization for Air Traffic Management Domain called NATS â National Air traffic Service, as a case study to illustrate an example of an organization currently undertaking critical self-reflection about automation policy or lack of such, along with the illustration of some unresolved deep concerns raised by the development, introduction, and continued use of automation. |
Document type: Part of book or chapter of book | Document type: Part of book or chapter of book | ||
== Full document == | == Full document == | ||
| − | <pdf>Media: | + | <pdf>Media:Amaldi_Smoker_2012a-beopen1388-5193-document.pdf</pdf> |
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf] | * [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41145-8_16.pdf] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_16 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_16], | ||
| + | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_16] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387], | ||
| + | : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/document https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/document], | ||
| + | : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/file/978-3-642-41145-8_16_Chapter.pdf https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/file/978-3-642-41145-8_16_Chapter.pdf] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/d615fa1c-99b6-4be4-a753-07fc66525e76 https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/d615fa1c-99b6-4be4-a753-07fc66525e76], | ||
| + | : [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ifip13/hwid2013.html#AmaldiS13 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ifip13/hwid2013.html#AmaldiS13], | ||
| + | : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/document https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387/document], | ||
| + | : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01463387], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2400118873 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2400118873] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:53, 25 January 2021
Abstract
Part 3: Evaluations, Interactions and Applications; International audience; Although automation has been introduced in all areas of public life, what seems to be missing is a reflection at the organizational or societal level about a policy of automation. By this we intend appropriate declarations made at the level of rationale, future plans and strategies to achieve intended goals and most importantly how those achievements will impact on various aspects of societal life, from legal responsibilities to moral and socio economic issues. In some public spheres these issues are becoming quite controversial because automation opens up possibilities of profound structural re-organization; however, we lack a discussion across and within different work domains to help us review methods or even methodological principles needed to gather and organize knowledge towards the construction of automation policies. This paper uses the UK service organization for Air Traffic Management Domain called NATS â National Air traffic Service, as a case study to illustrate an example of an organization currently undertaking critical self-reflection about automation policy or lack of such, along with the illustration of some unresolved deep concerns raised by the development, introduction, and continued use of automation.
Document type: Part of book or chapter of book
Full document
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Document information
Published on 01/01/2012
Volume 2012, 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8_16
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?