(Created page with " == Abstract == The evaluation of machine learning (ML) pipelines is essential during automatic ML pipeline composition and optimisation. The previous methods such as Bayesia...")
 
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 738967082 to Nguyen et al 2020a)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 11:22, 25 January 2021

Abstract

The evaluation of machine learning (ML) pipelines is essential during automatic ML pipeline composition and optimisation. The previous methods such as Bayesian-based and genetic-based optimisation, which are implemented in Auto-Weka, Auto-sklearn and TPOT, evaluate pipelines by executing them. Therefore, the pipeline composition and optimisation of these methods requires a tremendous amount of time that prevents them from exploring complex pipelines to find better predictive models. To further explore this research challenge, we have conducted experiments showing that many of the generated pipelines are invalid, and it is unnecessary to execute them to find out whether they are good pipelines. To address this issue, we propose a novel method to evaluate the validity of ML pipelines using a surrogate model (AVATAR). The AVATAR enables to accelerate automatic ML pipeline composition and optimisation by quickly ignoring invalid pipelines. Our experiments show that the AVATAR is more efficient in evaluating complex pipelines in comparison with the traditional evaluation approaches requiring their execution.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

Full document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document

Original document

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44584-3_28 under the license cc-by
https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11158,
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-44584-3_28.pdf,
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-44584-3_28,
https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-44584-3_28,
https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/2001.11158,
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/3018814782 under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2020

Volume 2020, 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44584-3_28
Licence: Other

Document Score

0

Views 0
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?