(Created page with " == Abstract == This report was written to satisfy a milestone of the Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery and CO2 Sequestration task of the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration projec...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This report was written to satisfy a milestone of the Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery and CO2 Sequestration task of the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration project. The report begins to assess the costs associated with separating the CO2 from flue gas and then injecting it into an unminable coal seam. The technical challenges and costs associated with CO2 separation from flue gas and transportation of the separated CO2 from the point source to an appropriate sequestration target was analyzed. The report includes the selection of a specific coal-fired power plant for the application of CO2 separation technology. An appropriate CO2 separation technology was identified from existing commercial technologies. The report also includes a process design for the chosen technology tailored to the selected power plant that used to obtain accurate costs of separating the CO2 from the flue gas. In addition, an analysis of the costs for compression and transportation of the CO2 from the point-source to an appropriate coal bed sequestration site was included in the report. | This report was written to satisfy a milestone of the Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery and CO2 Sequestration task of the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration project. The report begins to assess the costs associated with separating the CO2 from flue gas and then injecting it into an unminable coal seam. The technical challenges and costs associated with CO2 separation from flue gas and transportation of the separated CO2 from the point source to an appropriate sequestration target was analyzed. The report includes the selection of a specific coal-fired power plant for the application of CO2 separation technology. An appropriate CO2 separation technology was identified from existing commercial technologies. The report also includes a process design for the chosen technology tailored to the selected power plant that used to obtain accurate costs of separating the CO2 from the flue gas. In addition, an analysis of the costs for compression and transportation of the CO2 from the point-source to an appropriate coal bed sequestration site was included in the report. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 18: | Line 13: | ||
* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc900240/m2/1/high_res_d/935461.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc900240/m2/1/high_res_d/935461.pdf] | * [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc900240/m2/1/high_res_d/935461.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc900240/m2/1/high_res_d/935461.pdf] | ||
| − | * [https://core.ac.uk/display/71324779 https://core.ac.uk/display/71324779],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1481250563 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1481250563] | + | * [https://core.ac.uk/display/71324779 https://core.ac.uk/display/71324779], |
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1481250563 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1481250563] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:44, 22 January 2021
Abstract
This report was written to satisfy a milestone of the Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery and CO2 Sequestration task of the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration project. The report begins to assess the costs associated with separating the CO2 from flue gas and then injecting it into an unminable coal seam. The technical challenges and costs associated with CO2 separation from flue gas and transportation of the separated CO2 from the point source to an appropriate sequestration target was analyzed. The report includes the selection of a specific coal-fired power plant for the application of CO2 separation technology. An appropriate CO2 separation technology was identified from existing commercial technologies. The report also includes a process design for the chosen technology tailored to the selected power plant that used to obtain accurate costs of separating the CO2 from the flue gas. In addition, an analysis of the costs for compression and transportation of the CO2 from the point-source to an appropriate coal bed sequestration site was included in the report.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Document information
Published on 01/01/2007
Volume 2007, 2007
DOI: 10.2172/935461
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?