(Created page with " == Abstract == Eleven students enrolled in a 16-week radar simulation course were trained on current-day and NextGen tools. The order of the training was manipulated so that...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Eleven students enrolled in a 16-week radar simulation course were trained on current-day and NextGen tools. The order of the training was manipulated so that half of the students received current-day training first, followed by the training on NextGen tools, while the remaining students received training on the NextGen tools first, followed by current-day training. This paper reports data from the debriefing sessions following the conclusion of the course, with the intent of determining students' reaction to the training order and their comments and suggestions for future training schedules. Results indicated that future training should start with current-day procedures and delay the introduction of NextGen tools until trainees have established fundamental air traffic management skills. | Eleven students enrolled in a 16-week radar simulation course were trained on current-day and NextGen tools. The order of the training was manipulated so that half of the students received current-day training first, followed by the training on NextGen tools, while the remaining students received training on the NextGen tools first, followed by current-day training. This paper reports data from the debriefing sessions following the conclusion of the course, with the intent of determining students' reaction to the training order and their comments and suggestions for future training schedules. Results indicated that future training should start with current-day procedures and delay the introduction of NextGen tools until trainees have established fundamental air traffic management skills. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 15: | Line 10: | ||
* [http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf] | * [http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62], | ||
| + | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [https://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf https://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf], | ||
| + | : [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62], | ||
| + | : [https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf], | ||
| + | : [https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf], | ||
| + | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rorie_et_al_2011a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rorie_et_al_2011a], | ||
| + | : [https://hsi.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf https://hsi.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf], | ||
| + | : [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/hci/hci2011-12.html#RorieKMBMMVSB11 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/hci/hci2011-12.html#RorieKMBMMVSB11], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1583185867 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1583185867] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:24, 21 January 2021
Abstract
Eleven students enrolled in a 16-week radar simulation course were trained on current-day and NextGen tools. The order of the training was manipulated so that half of the students received current-day training first, followed by the training on NextGen tools, while the remaining students received training on the NextGen tools first, followed by current-day training. This paper reports data from the debriefing sessions following the conclusion of the course, with the intent of determining students' reaction to the training order and their comments and suggestions for future training schedules. Results indicated that future training should start with current-day procedures and delay the introduction of NextGen tools until trainees have established fundamental air traffic management skills.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62 under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm
- https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62,
- https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf,
- https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf,
- https://www.scipedia.com/public/Rorie_et_al_2011a,
- https://hsi.arc.nasa.gov/publications/prel_invest_train_order.pdf,
- https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/hci/hci2011-12.html#RorieKMBMMVSB11,
- https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1583185867
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/2011
Volume 2011, 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_62
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?