(Created page with " == Abstract == Recently, much research in quality of service (QoS) routing has focused on the unicast communication technique. However, Content Delivery Network (CDN) approa...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Recently, much research in quality of service (QoS) routing has focused on the unicast communication technique. However, Content Delivery Network (CDN) approach becomes popular because CDN enables effective and inexpensive improvement of Internet service quality. Therefore, we analyze in this paper a network processing two kinds of demands: content demands to CDN servers and standard unicast demands. Since MPLS defines effective mechanism for traffic engineering, we assume that the CDN is located in MPLS network. To examine the QoS performance of CDN-enabled MPLS network we propose new constraint-based algorithms for CDN server selection and evaluate relative performance of these algorithms and the most effective existing QoS unicast routing algorithms in terms of the demand rejection ratio. | Recently, much research in quality of service (QoS) routing has focused on the unicast communication technique. However, Content Delivery Network (CDN) approach becomes popular because CDN enables effective and inexpensive improvement of Internet service quality. Therefore, we analyze in this paper a network processing two kinds of demands: content demands to CDN servers and standard unicast demands. Since MPLS defines effective mechanism for traffic engineering, we assume that the CDN is located in MPLS network. To examine the QoS performance of CDN-enabled MPLS network we propose new constraint-based algorithms for CDN server selection and evaluate relative performance of these algorithms and the most effective existing QoS unicast routing algorithms in terms of the demand rejection ratio. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Line 15: | Line 10: | ||
* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F11422778_90.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F11422778_90.pdf] | * [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F11422778_90.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F11422778_90.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/11422778_90.pdf http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/11422778_90.pdf], | ||
+ | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11422778_90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11422778_90] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2005.html#Walkowiak05 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/networking/networking2005.html#Walkowiak05], | ||
+ | : [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11422778_90 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11422778_90], | ||
+ | : [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Walkowiak_2010a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Walkowiak_2010a], | ||
+ | : [https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2152040.2152156 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2152040.2152156], | ||
+ | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1520759045 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1520759045] |
Recently, much research in quality of service (QoS) routing has focused on the unicast communication technique. However, Content Delivery Network (CDN) approach becomes popular because CDN enables effective and inexpensive improvement of Internet service quality. Therefore, we analyze in this paper a network processing two kinds of demands: content demands to CDN servers and standard unicast demands. Since MPLS defines effective mechanism for traffic engineering, we assume that the CDN is located in MPLS network. To examine the QoS performance of CDN-enabled MPLS network we propose new constraint-based algorithms for CDN server selection and evaluate relative performance of these algorithms and the most effective existing QoS unicast routing algorithms in terms of the demand rejection ratio.
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Published on 01/01/2010
Volume 2010, 2010
DOI: 10.1007/11422778_90
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?