m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 788208190 to Carrozzo et al 2006a) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The GMPLS standardization is paving the way for new configurable Traffic Engineering (TE) policies and new survivability schemes for transport networks. In this context, a centralized Path Computation System (PCS) has been implemented, suited for transport networks with a GMPLS control plane. After a brief description of the requirements for a PCS in a GMPLS network, some design issues for the proposed implementation are drawn, with particular emphasis on the centralized approach and on the strategies for achieving the connection survivability. Some results of an intensive testing campaign are shown for the validation of the design choices. | The GMPLS standardization is paving the way for new configurable Traffic Engineering (TE) policies and new survivability schemes for transport networks. In this context, a centralized Path Computation System (PCS) has been implemented, suited for transport networks with a GMPLS control plane. After a brief description of the requirements for a PCS in a GMPLS network, some design issues for the proposed implementation are drawn, with particular emphasis on the centralized approach and on the strategies for achieving the connection survivability. Some results of an intensive testing campaign are shown for the validation of the design choices. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F0-387-23178-1_22.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F0-387-23178-1_22.pdf] | * [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F0-387-23178-1_22.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F0-387-23178-1_22.pdf] | ||
| − | * [http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22],[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22] | + | * [http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22], |
| + | : [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22] | ||
| − | * [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22],[https:// | + | * [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22], |
| + | : [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/opnetec/opnetec2004.html#CarrozzoGG04 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/opnetec/opnetec2004.html#CarrozzoGG04], | ||
| + | : [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2163410070 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2163410070] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:24, 21 January 2021
Abstract
The GMPLS standardization is paving the way for new configurable Traffic Engineering (TE) policies and new survivability schemes for transport networks. In this context, a centralized Path Computation System (PCS) has been implemented, suited for transport networks with a GMPLS control plane. After a brief description of the requirements for a PCS in a GMPLS network, some design issues for the proposed implementation are drawn, with particular emphasis on the centralized approach and on the strategies for achieving the connection survivability. Some results of an intensive testing campaign are shown for the validation of the design choices.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
Document information
Published on 01/01/2006
Volume 2006, 2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23178-1_22
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?