(Created page with " == Abstract == There is really no debate about the superior comparative efficiency of ships with respect to fuel consumption when calculated per deadweight tonne along route...") |
m (Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 240751409 to Fridell Hjelle 2012a) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 16:44, 20 January 2021
Abstract
There is really no debate about the superior comparative efficiency of ships with respect to fuel consumption when calculated per deadweight tonne along routes of similar length. However, the emission figures calculated per deadweight tonne is only relevant for bulk transports, and fuel consumption per cargo tonne is quite different for typical short sea shipping services based on container or RoRo technologies. Further, other emissions to air, like sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particles, are typically very high for shipping â especially when no abatement technologies are applied.
Original document
The different versions of the original document can be found in:
- https://www.intechopen.com/chapter/pdf-download/27678 under the license cc-by
- https://www.intechopen.com/books/environmental-health-emerging-issues-and-practice/the-comparative-environmental-performance-of-short-sea-shipping,https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/27678/InTech-When_is_short_sea_shipping_environmentally_competitive_.pdf,https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Erik_Fridell/publication/221923919_When_is_Short_Sea_Shipping_Environmentally_Competitive/links/00b7d529de273f2fdc000000.pdf,https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/152454,https://core.ac.uk/display/52065700,https://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:ito:pchaps:71792,https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1499521304
Document information
Published on 01/01/2012
Volume 2012, 2012
DOI: 10.5772/38303
Licence: Other
Share this document
Keywords
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?