(Created page with "==1 Title, abstract and keywords<!-- Your document should start with a concise and informative title. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviatio...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==1 Title, abstract and keywords<!-- Your document should start with a concise and informative title. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible. Capitalize the first word of the title.
+
==Abstract==
  
−
Provide a maximum of 6 keywords, and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, 'and', 'of'). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field should be used. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.
+
The aim of this work is to describe a numerical framework for reliably and robustly simulating the different kinematic conditions exhibited by granular materials while spreading ---from a stagnant condition, when the material is at rest, to a transition to granular flow, and back to a deposit profile. The gist of the employed modeling approach was already presented by the authors in a recent work (Cante et al., 2014), but no proper description of the underlying numerical techniques was provided therein. The present paper focuses precisely on the detailed discussion of such numerical techniques, as well as on its rigorous validation with the experimental results obtained by Lajeunesse, et al. in Ref. ( Lajeunesse et al., 2004). The constitutive model is based on the concepts of large strains plasticity. The yield surface is defined in terms of the Drucker Prager yield function, endowed with a deviatoric plastic flow and the elastic part by a hypoelastic model. The plastic flow condition is assumed nearly incompressible, so a u - p mixed formulation, with a stabilization of the pressure term via the Polynomial Pressure Projection (PPP), is employed. The numerical scheme takes as starting point the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) in which the spatial domain is continuously redefined by a different nodal reconnection, generated by a Delaunay triangulation. In contrast to classical PFEM approximations ( Idelsohn et al., 2004), in which the free boundary is obtained by a geometrical technique (a-shape method), in this work the boundary is treated as a material surface, and the boundary nodes are removed or inserted by means of an error function. One of the novelties of this work is the use of the so-called Impl-Ex hybrid integration technique to enhance the spectral properties of the algorithmic tangent moduli and thus reduce the number of iterations and robustness of the accompanying Newton-Raphson solution algorithm (compared with fully implicit schemes respectively). The new set of numerical tools implemented in the PFEM algorithm – including new discretization techniques, the use of a projection of the variables between meshes, and the constraint of the free-surface instead using classic a-shape – allows us to eliminate the negative Jacobians present during large deformation problems, which is one of the drawbacks in the simulation of granular flows. Finally, numerical results are compared with the experiments developed in Ref. (Lajeunesse et al., 2004), where a granular mass, initially confined in a cylindrical container, is suddenly allowed to spread by the sudden removal of the container. The study is carried out using different geometries with varying initial aspect ratios. The excellent agreement between computed and experimental results convincingly demonstrates the reliability of the model to reproduce different kinematic conditions in transient and stationary regimes.
  
−
An abstract is required for every document; it should succinctly summarize the reason for the work, the main findings, and the conclusions of the study. Abstract is often presented separately from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. For this reason, references and hyperlinks should be avoided. If references are essential, then cite the author(s) and year(s). Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself. -->==
+
==Full Document==
  
−
 
+
<pdf>Media:Draft_Samper_312512315_6860_16694429.pdf</pdf>
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
==2 The main text<!-- You can enter and format the text of this document by selecting the ‘Edit’ option in the menu at the top of this frame or next to the title of every section of the document. This will give access to the visual editor. Alternatively, you can edit the source of this document (Wiki markup format) by selecting the ‘Edit source’ option.
+
−
 
+
−
Most of the documents in Scipedia are written in English (write your manuscript in American or British English, but not a mixture of these). Anyhow, specific publications in other languages can be published in Scipedia. In any case, the documents published in other languages must have an abstract written in English.
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
2.1 Subsections
+
−
 
+
−
Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1, 1.2, etc. and then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ... Use this numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Capitalize the first word of the headings.
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
2.2 General guidelines
+
−
 
+
−
Some general guidelines that should be followed in your manuscripts are:
+
−
 
+
−
*  Avoid hyphenation at the end of a line.
+
−
 
+
−
*  Symbols denoting vectors and matrices should be indicated in bold type. Scalar variable names should normally be expressed using italics.
+
−
 
+
−
*  Use decimal points (not commas); use a space for thousands (10 000 and above).
+
−
 
+
−
*  Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions. In particular use the international system of units (SI). If other quantities are mentioned, give their equivalent in SI.
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
2.3 Tables, figures, lists and equations
+
−
 
+
−
Please insert tables as editable text and not as images. Tables should be placed next to the relevant text in the article. Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.
+
−
 
+
−
Graphics may be inserted directly in the document and positioned as they should appear in the final manuscript.
+
−
 
+
−
Number the figures according to their sequence in the text. Ensure that each illustration has a caption. A caption should comprise a brief title. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used. Try to keep the resolution of the figures to a minimum of 300 dpi. If a finer resolution is required, the figure can be inserted as supplementary material
+
−
 
+
−
For tabular summations that do not deserve to be presented as a table, lists are often used. Lists may be either numbered or bulleted. Below you see examples of both.
+
−
 
+
−
1. The first entry in this list
+
−
 
+
−
2. The second entry
+
−
 
+
−
2.1. A subentry
+
−
 
+
−
3. The last entry
+
−
 
+
−
* A bulleted list item
+
−
 
+
−
* Another one
+
−
 
+
−
You may choose to number equations for easy referencing. In that case they must be numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals in parentheses on the right hand side of the page. Below is an example of formulae that should be referenced as eq. (1].
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
2.4 Supplementary material
+
−
 
+
−
Supplementary material can be inserted to support and enhance your article. This includes video material, animation sequences, background datasets, computational models, sound clips and more. In order to ensure that your material is directly usable, please provide the files with a preferred maximum size of 50 MB. Please supply a concise and descriptive caption for each file. -->==
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
==3 Bibliography<!--
+
−
Citations in text will follow a citation-sequence system (i.e. sources are numbered by order of reference so that the first reference cited in the document is [1], the second [2], and so on) with the number of the reference in square brackets. Once a source has been cited, the same number is used in all subsequent references. If the numbers are not in a continuous sequence, use commas (with no spaces) between numbers. If you have more than two numbers in a continuous sequence, use the first and last number of the sequence joined by a hyphen
+
−
 
+
−
You should ensure that all references are cited in the text and that the reference list. References should preferably refer to documents published in Scipedia. Unpublished results should not be included in the reference list, but can be mentioned in the text. The reference data must be updated once publication is ready. Complete bibliographic information for all cited references must be given following the standards in the field (IEEE and ISO 690 standards are recommended). If possible, a hyperlink to the referenced publication should be given. See examples for Scipedia’s articles [1], other publication articles [2], books [3], book chapter [4], conference proceedings [5], and online documents [6], shown in references section below. -->==
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
==4 Acknowledgments<!-- Acknowledgments should be inserted at the end of the document, before the references section. -->==
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
==5 References<!--[1] Author, A. and Author, B. (Year) Title of the article. Title of the Publication. Article code. Available: http://www.scipedia.com/ucode.
+
−
 
+
−
[2] Author, A. and Author, B. (Year) Title of the article. Title of the Publication. Volume number, first page-last page.
+
−
 
+
−
[3] Author, C. (Year). Title of work: Subtitle (edition.). Volume(s). Place of publication: Publisher.
+
−
 
+
−
[4] Author of Part, D. (Year). Title of chapter or part. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), Title: Subtitle of book (edition, inclusive page numbers). Place of publication: Publisher.
+
−
 
+
−
[5] Author, E. (Year, Month date). Title of the article. In A. Editor, B. Editor, and C. Editor. Title of published proceedings. Paper presented at title of conference, Volume number, first page-last page. Place of publication.
+
−
 
+
−
[6] Institution or author. Title of the document. Year. [Online] (Date consulted: day, month and year). Available: http://www.scipedia.com/document.pdf.
+
−
-->==
+

Revision as of 08:41, 12 May 2020

Abstract

The aim of this work is to describe a numerical framework for reliably and robustly simulating the different kinematic conditions exhibited by granular materials while spreading ---from a stagnant condition, when the material is at rest, to a transition to granular flow, and back to a deposit profile. The gist of the employed modeling approach was already presented by the authors in a recent work (Cante et al., 2014), but no proper description of the underlying numerical techniques was provided therein. The present paper focuses precisely on the detailed discussion of such numerical techniques, as well as on its rigorous validation with the experimental results obtained by Lajeunesse, et al. in Ref. ( Lajeunesse et al., 2004). The constitutive model is based on the concepts of large strains plasticity. The yield surface is defined in terms of the Drucker Prager yield function, endowed with a deviatoric plastic flow and the elastic part by a hypoelastic model. The plastic flow condition is assumed nearly incompressible, so a u - p mixed formulation, with a stabilization of the pressure term via the Polynomial Pressure Projection (PPP), is employed. The numerical scheme takes as starting point the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) in which the spatial domain is continuously redefined by a different nodal reconnection, generated by a Delaunay triangulation. In contrast to classical PFEM approximations ( Idelsohn et al., 2004), in which the free boundary is obtained by a geometrical technique (a-shape method), in this work the boundary is treated as a material surface, and the boundary nodes are removed or inserted by means of an error function. One of the novelties of this work is the use of the so-called Impl-Ex hybrid integration technique to enhance the spectral properties of the algorithmic tangent moduli and thus reduce the number of iterations and robustness of the accompanying Newton-Raphson solution algorithm (compared with fully implicit schemes respectively). The new set of numerical tools implemented in the PFEM algorithm – including new discretization techniques, the use of a projection of the variables between meshes, and the constraint of the free-surface instead using classic a-shape – allows us to eliminate the negative Jacobians present during large deformation problems, which is one of the drawbacks in the simulation of granular flows. Finally, numerical results are compared with the experiments developed in Ref. (Lajeunesse et al., 2004), where a granular mass, initially confined in a cylindrical container, is suddenly allowed to spread by the sudden removal of the container. The study is carried out using different geometries with varying initial aspect ratios. The excellent agreement between computed and experimental results convincingly demonstrates the reliability of the model to reproduce different kinematic conditions in transient and stationary regimes.

Full Document

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top
GET EPUB

Document information

Published on 01/01/2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.013
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 2
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?

I am an author