m (Cinmemj moved page Draft Samper 920859477 to Zienkiewicz Onate 1992a) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Published in ''Non linear computational mechanics. State of the art.'' P. Wriggers | + | Published in ''Non linear computational mechanics. State of the art.'' P. Wriggers,R. Wagner and E. Stein (eds.), Chapter IV, Beam, Plate and Shell Formulations, pp. 240-254, Springer Verlag, 1991 |
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
The finite volume method appears to be a particular case of finite elements with a non Galerkin weighting. It is course less accurate for self adjoint problems but has some computationally useful features for first order equations involving only surface integrals. For certain problems this is a substational economy and leads to computationally useful approximations. | The finite volume method appears to be a particular case of finite elements with a non Galerkin weighting. It is course less accurate for self adjoint problems but has some computationally useful features for first order equations involving only surface integrals. For certain problems this is a substational economy and leads to computationally useful approximations. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 19 December 2019
Published in Non linear computational mechanics. State of the art. P. Wriggers,R. Wagner and E. Stein (eds.), Chapter IV, Beam, Plate and Shell Formulations, pp. 240-254, Springer Verlag, 1991
Abstract
The finite volume method appears to be a particular case of finite elements with a non Galerkin weighting. It is course less accurate for self adjoint problems but has some computationally useful features for first order equations involving only surface integrals. For certain problems this is a substational economy and leads to computationally useful approximations.
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/1992
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Share this document
claim authorship
Are you one of the authors of this document?