(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Published in ''Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization'' Vol. 45 (3), pp. 433-450, 2012<br /> | + | Published in ''Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization'', Vol. 45 (3), pp. 433-450, 2012<br /> |
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0705-0 | DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0705-0 | ||
+ | |||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
Published in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 45 (3), pp. 433-450, 2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0705-0
There are many applications in aeronautical/aerospace engineering where some values of the design parameters/states cannot be provided or determined accurately. These values can be related to the geometry (wingspan, length, angles) and or to operational flight conditions that vary due to the presence of uncertainty parameters (Mach, angle of attack, air density and temperature, etc.). These uncertainty design parameters cannot be ignored in engineering design and must be taken into the optimisation task to produce more realistic and reliable solutions. In this paper, a robust/uncertainty design method with statistical constraints is introduced to produce a set of reliable solutions which have high performance and low sensitivity. Robust design concept coupled with Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) is defined by applying two statistical sampling formulas; mean and variance/standard deviation associated with the optimisation fitness/objective functions. The methodology is based on a canonical evolution strategy and incorporates the concepts of hierarchical topology, parallel computing and asynchronous evaluation. It is implemented for two practical Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) design problems; the first case considers robust multi-objective (single-disciplinary: aerodynamics) design optimisation and the second considers a robust multidisciplinary (aero-structures) design optimisation. Numerical results show that the solutions obtained by the robust design method with statistical constraints have a more reliable performance and sensitivity in both aerodynamics and structures when compared to the baseline design. KeywordsRobust/uncertainty design–Multi-objective–Multidisciplinary–UAS–Evolutionary algorithms.
Published on 01/01/2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0705-0
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
Are you one of the authors of this document?