m (Cinmemj moved page Draft Samper 477933790 to Samper et al 2018ax) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent. | In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pdf>Media:Onate_Idelsohn_1994a_8132_IdelOn1994.pdf</pdf> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:00, 12 April 2019
Published in Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering Vol. 37 (19), pp. 3323-3341, 1994
doi: 10.1002/nme.1620371908
Abstract
In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent.
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/1994
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620371908
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license
