(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent. | In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pdf>Media:Onate_Idelsohn_1994a_8132_IdelOn1994.pdf</pdf> |
Published in Int. Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering Vol. 37 (19), pp. 3323-3341, 1994
doi: 10.1002/nme.1620371908
In this paper a comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods is presented in the context of elliptic, convective–diffusion and fluid flow problems. The paper shows that both procedures share a number of features, like mesh discretization and approximation. Moreover, it is shown that in many cases both techniques are completely equivalent.
Published on 01/01/1994
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620371908
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license