Line 1: Line 1:
Published in ''Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.'', Vol. 195, pp. 4681–4696, 1996
+
Published in ''Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.'', Vol. 195, pp. 4681–4696, 2006<br />
<br />
+
 
doi: :10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.006
 
doi: :10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.006
  

Latest revision as of 13:59, 11 February 2019

Published in Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 195, pp. 4681–4696, 2006
doi: :10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.006


Abstract

In the last decade a family of methods called meshless methods has been developed both for structural and fluid mechanics problems. After these ideas, a possible classification for numerical formulations may be to separate the methods that make use of a standard finite element mesh (such as those made of tetrahedra or hexahedra), from those that do not need a standard mesh, namely the meshless methods. For solving a partial different equation by a numerical method, a possible alternative may be either to use a mesh method or a meshless method. This paper discusses this issue to show that this choice is not, in the large majorities of the cases, the right question.

The PDF file did not load properly or your web browser does not support viewing PDF files. Download directly to your device: Download PDF document
Back to Top

Document information

Published on 01/01/2006

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.006
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Times cited: 68
Views 22
Recommendations 0

Share this document