m (Cinmemj moved page Draft Samper 626801402 to Samper et al 2019j) |
m (Move page script moved page Samper et al 2019j to Onate Bugeda 1993a) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The concepts of solution error and optimal mesh in adaptive finite element analysis are revisited. It is shown that the correct evaluation of the convergence rate of the error norms involved in the error measure and the optimal mesh criteria chosen are essential to avoid oscillations in the refinement process. Two mesh optimality criteria based on: (a) the equal distribution of global error, and (b) the specific error over the elements are studied and compared in detail through some examples of application. | The concepts of solution error and optimal mesh in adaptive finite element analysis are revisited. It is shown that the correct evaluation of the convergence rate of the error norms involved in the error measure and the optimal mesh criteria chosen are essential to avoid oscillations in the refinement process. Two mesh optimality criteria based on: (a) the equal distribution of global error, and (b) the specific error over the elements are studied and compared in detail through some examples of application. | ||
| − | <pdf>Media: | + | <pdf>Media:Samper_et_al_2019j_9286_art-01.pdf</pdf> |
Latest revision as of 12:40, 1 February 2019
Published in Engineering Computations Vol. 10 (4), pp. 307-321, 1993
doi: 10.1108/eb023910
Abstract
The concepts of solution error and optimal mesh in adaptive finite element analysis are revisited. It is shown that the correct evaluation of the convergence rate of the error norms involved in the error measure and the optimal mesh criteria chosen are essential to avoid oscillations in the refinement process. Two mesh optimality criteria based on: (a) the equal distribution of global error, and (b) the specific error over the elements are studied and compared in detail through some examples of application.
Back to Top
