You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

x
 
1
== Abstract ==
2
3
Bonded  brickwork  loadbearing walls are commonly seen in many colonial period 
4
structures  around  the  world;  however,  most  research  studies  in  the  past  and  the  current 
5
design provisions are primarily based on single leaf brickwork. Due to the anisotropic natu re 
6
of  brickwork,  the  strength  and  deformation  characteristics  would  be  different  for  bonded 
7
brickwork walls and their design using  the provisions of single leaf bonded brickworks may 
8
be un-conservative. Therefore, to understand the compressive behaviour of differently bonded 
9
brickworks, an experimental programme followed by a numerical investigation were carried 
10
out in this research. The experimental programme comprised of  testing nine wallettes under 
11
uniaxial compression. Three different types of bonded thicknesses (single, double and triple) 
12
were used to construct the wallettes. The experimental results are presented and discussed in 
13
terms of failure modes, compressive strengths and stress-strain responses obtained. Further a 
14
numerical  investigation  based  on the micro modelling approach was employed to verify the 
15
experimental  findings.  The  experimental  and  numerical  modelling  results  indicate  that  the 
16
change in brickwork thicknesses does not significantly increase the compressive strength of 
17
the masonry. The increased number of weak perpend joints in the bonded brickwork wallettes, 
18
could  be  a reason of lower strength and thus, a general notion of increment in compressive 
19
resistance  due  to  the  reduction  in  slenderness  i s  not  applicable  for  bonded  brickwork. 
20
Parametric  analyses  were  also  carried  out  and  reported  for  different  slenderness ratios to 
21
extend the understanding on the behaviour of bonded brickworks under compression.
22
23
== Full document ==
24
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_423543543p1217.pdf</pdf>
25
== References ==
26
27
[1]  Bennett,  R.M.,    Boyd,  K.A.,  and    Flanagan,  R.D.    Compressive  properties  of  structural clay tile prisms. J. Struct. Eng (1997) 123(7): 920–926.  
28
29
[2]  Thamboo,  J.A.  and    Dhanasekar,  M.    Behaviour  of  thin  layer  mortared  concrete  masonry under  combined shear and compression. Aust. J. Struct. Eng (2016) 17(1): 39–52.  
30
31
[3]  Zahra,  T.  and  Dhanasekar,  M.    Prediction  of  masonry  compressive  behaviour  using  a damage  mechanics  inspired  modelling  method.  Constr.  Build.  Mater  (2016)  109:  128–138.  
32
33
[4]  Pelà, L.,  Canella, E.,  Aprile, A., and Roca, P.  Compression test of masonry core samples extracted from  existing  brickwork. Constr. Build. Mater (2016) 119: 230–240.  
34
35
[5]  Segura,  J.,    Pela,  L.  and    Roca,  P.  Monotonic  and  cyclic  testing  of  clay  brick  and  lime mortar masonry  in compression. Constr. Build. Mater (2018) 193: 453–466.  
36
37
[6]  Gumeste,  K.S.  and    Venkatarama  Reddy,  B.V.    Strength  and  elasticity  of  brick  masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. Mater. Struct (2007) 29: 241–253  
38
39
[7]  Zahra, T. and  Dhanasekar, M.  A generalised damage model for masonry under  compression. Int. J. Damage Mech. (2016) 25(5): 629–660.  
40
41
[8]  Thamboo, J.A. and Dhanasekar, M.  Correlation between the performance of solid  masonry  prisms and wallettes under compression. J. Build. Eng (2019) 22: 429–438.  
42
43
[9]  Valluzzi,  M.R.,    Da  Porto,  F.  and    Modena,  C.  Behavior  and  modeling  of  strengthened three-leaf stone masonry  walls. Mater. Struct (2004) 37(3): 184–192.  
44
45
[10] Binda,  L.,    Pina-Henriques,  J.,    Anzani,  A.,    Fontana,  A.  and    Lourenco,  P.B.    A contribution  for  the  understanding  of  load-transfer  mechanisms  in  multileaf  masonry  walls: Testing and modelling.  Eng. Struct (2006) 28: 1132–1148.  
46
47
[11] Oliveira,  D.V.  and    Lourenço,  P.B.    Experimental  behaviour  of  three-leaf  stone  masonry walls  The  construction  aspects  of  built  heritage  protection,  Dubrovnik,  Croatia  2006 (2006) 356–362.  
48
49
[12] BS EN 1052-1:1999 Methods of test for masonry. Determination of compressive  strength,  BSI.  
50
51
[13] Thamboo,  J.A.  and  Dhanasekar,  M.    Assessment  of  the  characteristics  of  lime  mortar bonded  brickwork  wallettes  under  monotonic  and  cyclic  compression.  Const.  Build. Mater (2020) 261: 120003.  
52
53
[14] Nazir,  S.  and  Dhanasekar,  M.    Modelling  the  failure  of  thin  layered  mortar  joints  in masonry.  Eng. Struct (2013) 49: 615–627.   
54
55
[15] Bolhassani,  M.,    Hamid,  A.  A.,   Lau, A.C.W. and  Moon, F.  Simplified micro modelling of partially grouted masonry  assemblages. Constr. Build. Mater (2015) 83:159–173. 
56
57
[16] ABAQUS,  Finite  element  software  documentation,  Dassault  Systèmes,  Simulia  RI,  USA, 2018.  
58
59
[17] Zahra,  T.  and    Dhanasekar,  M.    Characterisation  and  strategies  for  mitigation  of  the contact surface unevenness in dry-stack masonry. Constr. Build. Mater (2018) 169: 612– 628.  
60
61
[18] ASTM  C1314  –  14  Standard  Test  Method  for  Compressive  Strength  of  Masonry  Prisms, ASTM  International,  USA.
62

Return to Thamboo et al 2021a.

Back to Top
GET PDF

Document information

Published on 30/11/21
Submitted on 30/11/21

Volume Inspection methods, non-destructive techniques and laboratory testing, 2021
DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.055
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Views 8
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?