You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
x
1
Published in ''Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.'', Vol. 195, pp. 4681–4696, 19962
<br />3
doi: :10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.0064
5
6
==Abstract==7
8
In the last decade a family of methods called meshless methods has been developed both for structural and fluid mechanics problems.9
After these ideas, a possible classification for numerical formulations may be to separate the methods that make use of a standard finite10
element mesh (such as those made of tetrahedra or hexahedra), from those that do not need a standard mesh, namely the meshless methods.11
For solving a partial different equation by a numerical method, a possible alternative may be either to use a mesh method or a meshless12
method. This paper discusses this issue to show that this choice is not, in the large majorities of the cases, the right question.13
14
<pdf>Media:Draft_Samper_341349531_7821_1-s2.0-S0045782505005013.pdf</pdf>15
Return to Idelsohn Onate 2018a.
Back to Top
Document information
Published on 01/01/2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.006
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license