You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

x
 
1
2
== Resumen ==
3
4
Este estudio se centra en las publicaciones de las universidades españolas en la Web of Science (WoS) durante 2014-2016 (125.824 artículos) y calcula 17 indicadores con Altmetric.com. Se han establecido tres objetivos: 1) ofrecer una perspectiva general de las altmétricas en las universidades españolas, 2) determinar la cobertura de Altmetric.com en el caso español y 3) establecer cuáles son las altmétricas más relevantes. Los resultados evidencian que el 42% de los artículos en la WoS están indexados en Altmetric.com. Los indicadores generados por Twitter, prensa digital, Facebook y Wikipedia explican el 82% de la varianza. Como conclusiones se señalan que: a) publicar en revistas de alto impacto y en áreas como Medicina y Biología contribuye a que las universidades obtengan mejores altmétricas; y b) un reducido número de indicadores es suficiente para determinar el impacto altmétrico.  
5
6
7
[https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/EPI/article/view/epi.2018.may.03/40049 <span style="color:#0645AD; font-weight: bold">Pulsa aquí para acceder a la version PDF</span>]
8
9
10
11
== Referencias ==
12
13
Altmetric.com (2017a). “How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated?”. Altmetric support. https://goo.gl/4hvTPp
14
15
Altmetric.com (2017b). “Top 100 articles 2017”. Altmetric.com. https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2017/#list
16
17
Bar-Ilan, Judit (2008). “Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century – A review”. Journal of informetrics, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001
18
19
Bornmann, Lutz (2014). “Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
20
21
Costas, Rodrigo; Zahedi, Zohreh; Wouters, Paul (2015). “Do ‘altmetrics’ correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309
22
23
Gorraiz, Juan; Melero-Fuentes, David; Gumpenberger, Christian; Valderrama-Zurián, Juan-Carlos (2016). “Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008
24
25
Gray, Virginia (2017). Principal component analysis: Methods, applications & technology. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Mathematics Research Development. ISBN: 978 1536108897
26
27
Gumpenberger, Christian; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Gorraiz, Juan (2016). “The ecstasy and the agony of the Altmetric score”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 2, pp. 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5
28
29
Hammarfelt, Björn (2014). “Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3
30
31
Haustein, Stefanie (2016). “Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 1, pp. 413-423. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9
32
33
Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timothy D.; Costas, Rodrigo (2015). “Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories”. In: Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics: A festschrift in honor of Blaise Cronin. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05701
34
35
Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Bar-Ilan, Judit; Priem, Jason; Shema, Hadas; Terliesner, Jens (2014a). “Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3
36
37
Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Thelwall, Mike; Larivière, Vincent (2014b). “Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 4, pp. 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101
38
39
Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Ràfols, Ismael (2015). “The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics”. Nature, v. 520, n. 7548, pp. 429-431 https://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351
40
41
Liu, Jean; Adie, Euan (2013). “Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspective”. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390410
42
43
Martín-Martín, Alberto; Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). “The role of ego in academic profile services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID”. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745892
44
45
Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 8, pp. 1627-1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071
46
47
Peters, Isabella; Kraker, Peter; Lex, Elisabeth; Gumpenberger, Christian; Gorraiz, Juan (2016). “Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations and altmetrics”. Scientometrics, v. 107, n. 2, pp. 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4
48
49
Piwowar, Heather (2013a). “Altmetrics: Value all research products”. Nature, v. 493, n. 7431, pp. 159-159. https://doi.org/10.1038/493159a
50
51
Piwowar, Heather (2013b). “Introduction altmetrics: what, why and where?”. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404
52
53
Priem, Jason; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2010). “Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday, v. 15, n. 7. http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
54
55
Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather A.; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2012). “Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact”. http://arxiv.org/html/1203.4745
56
57
Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). “Altmetrics: A Manifesto”. Altmetrics.org. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
58
59
Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). “New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com”. El profesional de la information, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 359-366. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03
60
61
Romero-Frías, Esteban; Vaughan, Liwen (2012). “Exploring the relationships between media and political parties through web hyperlink analysis: The case of Spain”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 5, pp. 967-976. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22625
62
63
Sud, Pardeep; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Evaluating altmetrics”. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 2, pp. 1131-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2
64
65
Thelwall, Mike (2008). “Bibliometrics to webometrics”. Journal of information science, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
66
67
Thelwall, Mike; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2013). “Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services”. PloS one, v. 8, n. 5, pp. e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
68
69
Thelwall, Mike; Vaughan, Liwen; Björneborn, Lennart (2005). “Webometrics”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 81-135.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440390110
70
71
Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2017). “Altmetric beauties. ¿Cuáles son los trabajos científicos con mayor impacto en las redes sociales?”. En: I Congreso internacional “Territorios digitales”. Universidad de Granada, Medialab UGR, Granada, 29-30 junio 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/47115
72
73
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2013). “Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0”. Comunicar, v. 21, n. 41. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-05
74
75
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Gumpenberger, Christian; Gorraiz, Juan (2017). “PlumX as a potential tool to assess the macroscopic multidimensional impact of books”. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, v. 2, n. 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00005
76
77
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis (2014). “Presencia en redes sociales y altmétricas de los principales autores de la revista ‘El profesional de la información’”. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 367-372. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.04
78
79
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Gorraiz, Juan (2017). “Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX”. Scientometrics, v. 113, n. 3, pp. 1371-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2539-z
80
81
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2016). “Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00232
82
83
Vaughan, Liwen; Wu, Guozhu (2004). “Links to commercial websites as a source of business information”. Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 3, pp. 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034389.14825.bc
84
85
Weller, Martin (2011). The digital scholar. How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury. ISBN: 978 1 84966 497 4
86
87
Wilsdon, James; Allen, Liz; Belfiore, Eleanora; Campbell, Philip; Curry, Stephen; Hill, Steven; Jones, Richard; Kain, Roger; Kerridge Simon; Thelwall, Mike; Tinkler, Jane; Viney, Ian; Wouters, Paul; Hill, Jude; Johnson, Ben (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
88
89
Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control — tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF-foundation. http://research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Users-narcissism-and-control.pdf
90

Return to Torres-Salinas et al 2018a.

Back to Top

Document information

Published on 16/06/18
Accepted on 16/06/18
Submitted on 16/06/18

Volume 27, Issue 3, 2018
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2018.may.03
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA license

Document Score

0

Times cited: 2
Views 33
Recommendations 0

Share this document

claim authorship

Are you one of the authors of this document?